25 Comments
User's avatar
Walter Aske's avatar

Conservatives long for the vanished, genteel world, for civilised debate, lifelong friendship between political opposites, tea and cake. It's lovely but the instinct to seek common ground, to pre-emptively concede, to offer Battenberg cake to a fiery rival, is as out of place now as it would have been in Russia in 1917. Gentility is now taken as weakness, and disavowing one's radicals is akin to a wartime army closing down its special operations units because they "scare" HR. We are at war already, we need wartime consiglieri.

Zander's avatar

"Every group, that is, except White conservatives. They have a completely different strategy: disavow their radicals in order to gain their enemy’s approval, endorsement and friendship. This is the “people pleaser” approach"

And as everywhere, this is seen as weakness.

Zuriel's avatar

💯 well said

Darby's avatar

It's unfortunate that our side and its "radical flank" keep kneecapping themselves instead of realizing you win by winning.

Skeptical1's avatar

Exactly! Well done.

Hopefully your sensible centrist colleagues read this and imbibe its strategies and tactics.

Depth's avatar

There's only one question that needs to be answered, and nobody asks it. Trump's Law is undefeated.

John's avatar

The problem is "our radicals" are funded by them every bit as much as "their radicals" are. We all know, or should know by now, the financial links of certain of "our radicals" to a supremacist group that look on white people as cattle and cannon fodder. So asking "our radicals" to calm down isn't going to work because they work for that other people, who worship another god on another mountaintop. A failed stone age religion from some 4,000 years ago that has been having a temper tantrum for the last 2,000 years because their messiah told them they were worshipping evil and that they were nothing special. The same messiah they were praying for the return of in the oval office a few days ago, yes the return of. So do they expect that same messiah to change his mind about them when they have not changed and he has not changed? Are we going to have to put up with thousands more years of their murderous temper tantrums or are they going to grow up and convert and turn up at prisons around the world demanding to be locked up for life to atone in at least part for their disgusting evil?

As Lenin I think it was said when someone in his party was worried about the opposition ..... "Don't worry about them for we are going to lead them."

Change, true change, can only come through total repentance of those in charge or through the inevitable societal collapse that lack of their repentance brings on when "they" no longer have power over these traitorous "radicals" that presently work for them and against us.

As the old saying goes regarding "our radicals", ...... "If the public know their names they aren't on our side."

And never were truer words spoken.

James Solbakken's avatar

"Radical" is a purely subjective term. Radicalism becomes conservatism after it's been around a while. I remember the communist hardliners in the USSR were called "conservative." I learned then that it doesn't mean anything like what the libtards pretend to think it means.

Woke leftist libtards don't use language to inform or communicate thoughts, or ideas, they only use words for rhetorical purposes, as weapons of mass manipulation and gaslighting.

PyongyangICBM's avatar

Ironically you wrote an article in which you point out that Cuckservatives show no loyalty, throw those to the right of them under the bus whilst spending a good portion of last year mourning the death of a guy who did that every chance he got - Charlie Kirk.

Millennial Woes's avatar

Yes. Even if he wasn't on our side, I don't believe he deserved a bullet in the neck. But I believe, by the end, he was on our side. Furthermore, his death galvanised the left who would do exactly the same to you and me.

PyongyangICBM's avatar

You are missing the point ,Woes. "They would do the same thing to you and me", the irony with that statement is that Charlie Kirk gave more time to lowlifes by "having open discourse" with them, than he would have to you and me. Charlie Kirk had more respect for deranged leftists like the Transformer that off'd him, than he did for "Nazis". People like CK did not give a shit when whites were being murdered by negroes, in fact he helped cover it up by blaming it on "The culture ". If we are to survive then you are going to have to toughen up when it comes to tolerating bad actors like Charlie Kirk

Millennial Woes's avatar

He was radically different by the end of his life. See his comments after Iryna Zarutska's murder.

James Solbakken's avatar

That's not how I remember Charlie Kirk. Are you trying to throw Charlie Kirk under the bus?

PyongyangICBM's avatar

Charlie Kirk was an anti-white, Shabbos-Goy. He threw everyone to the right of him u drr the bus. He said America was "an idea" , and anybody could be American while saying Israel had a righ to be an ethnostate. Fuck Charlie Cuck and all his spineless followers.

Gaddius's avatar

Lol. Hey, maybe try calming down?

PyongyangICBM's avatar

Lol, I am calm. If you don't like my opinion, dont read.

James Solbakken's avatar

If we don't like your opinions, do you have others?

John's avatar

He did but I think he had had an epiphany in the last few months ...... hence he had outlived his usefulness to them except as a public target practice figure whilst lying about what he had been saying and doing in those final months.

My brother was very like Charlie, completely duped by people he worked for who lived in occupied Palestine. WE used to have terrible arguments aout it and he would never admit he was wrong ....... and then, like Charlie, he started noticing that it was no ethno-state for you but we need an ethno-state for us etc etc etc and now he sees clearly that he was duped just as I think Charlie saw at the end ..... and through his handler Erika.

PyongyangICBM's avatar

Who gives a fuck if “he had an epiphany “ or not? Ill bet he wasn't going to hand back all the Shekels he laid his grubby hands on was he? People like him are what lead us to the mess we are in now- dire demographics, foreign wars to advance the interests of Jews. None of this could have happened without traitors like him. Conservatives are the scum of the earth, at least the progressives are honest in their intentions.

John's avatar

I give a fuck.

James Solbakken's avatar

America was formed at a particular point in time by a peculiar people with very definite ideas about how a nation is best organized. America is an idea that has room for any civilized person who is capable of understanding and accepting the basic ideas of freedom and responsibility. Brutal savages are not capable, and they should have been excluded. I agree that Charlie Kirk was not very good at articulating this idea, but his ignorance is not enough for me to throw him under the bus. As for Israel, there is nofa king way I'm ever siding with Israel's enemies, they are insane wackos and suicide balmers.

PyongyangICBM's avatar

Conservatards are a fucking joke. Nobody takes them seriously. Their whole "let's go back to the 1990s" is not taken seriously by anybody but themselves. Why do you people think anyone wants to hear what they have to say? They are spineless cowards who would sell their own mother out to appease the left.

John's avatar

God destroyed Israel 2,000 years ago and what God has put assunder only a fool would ever try to resurrect and only a bigger fool would ever support. Occupied Palestine is not Israel.

James Solbakken's avatar

God destroyed Israel. Yet, the Bible says the dry bones will be re-assembled in the Latter Days. Only a fool would deny it.

Ezekiel 37

1 The hand of the LORD was upon me, and carried me out in the spirit of the LORD, and set me down in the midst of the valley which was full of bones,

2 And caused me to pass by them round about: and, behold, there were very many in the open valley; and, lo, they were very dry.

3 And he said unto me, Son of man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord GOD, thou knowest.

4 Again he said unto me, Prophesy upon these bones, and say unto them, O ye dry bones, hear the word of the LORD.

5 Thus saith the Lord GOD unto these bones; Behold, I will cause breath to enter into you, and ye shall live:

6 And I will lay sinews upon you, and will bring up flesh upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and ye shall live; and ye shall know that I am the LORD.

7 So I prophesied as I was commanded: and as I prophesied, there was a noise, and behold a shaking, and the bones came together, bone to his bone.

8 And when I beheld, lo, the sinews and the flesh came up upon them, and the skin covered them above: but there was no breath in them.

9 Then said he unto me, Prophesy unto the wind, prophesy, son of man, and say to the wind, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Come from the four winds, O breath, and breathe upon these slain, that they may live.

10 So I prophesied as he commanded me, and the breath came into them, and they lived, and stood up upon their feet, an exceeding great army.

11 Then he said unto me, Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel: behold, they say, Our bones are dried, and our hope is lost: we are cut off for our parts.

12 Therefore prophesy and say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, O my people, I will open your graves, and cause you to come up out of your graves, and bring you into the land of Israel.

13 And ye shall know that I am the LORD, when I have opened your graves, O my people, and brought you up out of your graves,

14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the LORD have spoken it, and performed it, saith the LORD.