QED. Excellent analysis as ever! Thank you. Oddly, Red Ice have fallen for the 'fraudulent movie' take on CV. A shame because they may have put some of their esteemed viewers off. I hope not. I would only add that once you allow the nationalist genie out of the bottle there's no knowing what positive chaos he may generate. Forces ultimately beyond the elite's control will bring about their demise. The truth will out - not because it's virtuous, but because that's what truth does. Truth loves to foil humans. It's the ultimate trickster!
more than one thing can and usually is true at one and the same time. Mixed bag but it does raise tensions, especially amongst the young and those easy to manipulate, especially amongst the target audiences.
Two questions need to be asked of all things and at all times, qui bono? Follow the money. If you can answer those two questions as best you are able and thinking logically and rationally, then you have probably come closer to the truth than most are capable of. It just might be that it's not all of the truth, but as much of it as can be discerned. Nick Griffin has done his own analysis of this film and the questions which surround it. It might be worth viewing in and of itself
They don't just want immigrants dead though they want us dead too don't forget that. They obviously envisage a very chaotic state where all enemies of the state are neutralised. But generally I think it's hilarious that the traditional enemy is exposing himself as what he is and always has been. So much for muh multiculturalism LMAO
I've only seen the clip where the gunman takes out the migrants or whatever they are. I do know the actors who played these roles didn't do it because they wanted to get deported or have anyone who is brown deported either. I don't know what their motives were exactly - a payday? More films where they are hunted down? Their own revenge film? I wonder how many of the audience will take the side of the migrants in the film? 'They were brave to take on the role.' 'I want to see them in more stuff where I see a positive side to their culture, because this just paints a negative view.'
Why do we need friendly billionaires? The budget for CV was $2m. Much of this would have been actor fees (25%) and staff fees (50%).
The professional film level digital cameras, like a Sony FX6 or Komodo (entry options) costs £3-400 per week. Or £5-10k to buy / resell.
In our orbit must be enough talented people to reduce the wages to zero, with possible kickbacks if it makes money. I've met film school folks, actors etc at events. They're out there. It only requires a decent plot / script and a judicious use of non-expensive locations. Something which hits the right momentary Zeitgeist. Then the skill to film it with good momentum. Therefore, but.
If this could have happened, it would have happened. I can only think of one film that emerged from our sphere, and it is badly made with bad writing and bad acting. That is what you get for free. You're lucky even to get that; most people, if they aren't getting paid to do something, tend to always find there is something more pressing they need to be doing instead. This is why you need to pay people, which is why you need funding.
This is doubly true when you are asking people (especially actors) to become associated with something that will destroy their chances of a mainstream career.
Very well put! Let's for a moment reverse the situation and imagine some cultural marxist in 1950 make a 2022 Netflix historical drama with a gay disabled black knight and all the other tokens. He had actually wanted to change the culture subtly by introducing just a friendly black side character and letting the White Knight overstate his case too much so it would sound ridiculous. But when the other subversives saw he was about to cast several popular heterosexual movie stars and use German filmcameras and show the film in goy theatres and use national goy film distributors, he agreed to their demands, and they updated their demands and he had to include the gay, then the black, then the disabled, shoot it on Chinese gear in Palestine, include feminism and veganism in easy language and have the crusader knight give a land acknowledgement speech before felating his way into Jerusalem. In the end the movie somehow bombed and no one knew why - after all it contained all the marks of true leftist beliefs...
More strategically speaking: in the past decades White advocates were so used to get instantly cancelled that many erroneously thought their input needed to be like a hand granade, fast, small, comprehensively containing propellant and projectiles, blasting 360 degrees, applicable to all targets. But now that we are about to attain political and institutional power this strategy is very wrong. We will soon have access to millions of normie minds for prolonged periods of time (ideally via the national broadcasters that should not be defunded or scrapped but taken over) that a gradual approach will work the miracle. Ten movies undermining the current axiom on the topic, another ten introducing a different view, another ten showing the ideological conflict, another ten putting our arguments into the mouths of the pretty and good characters, and so on. And the normie herd will slowly veer into our direction and trample all our enemies with their conformist zeal.
I haven't seen, and am unlikely to ever watch, the film. FWIW, I agree with what you've written. Too many people hear the phrase 'psy-op', and get a dopamine hit. Sometimes, powerful people just want to make a buck, and that's all there is to it. A good example would be Graham Hancock's 'Ancient Apocalypse' documentary series.
Much was made about it being a Netflix production. The implication was that 'they' are trying to steer us a particular direction. But there really just seems to be an organic interest in the obvious flaws in current archaeological narratives (exact details aside).
(Edit: oh and full disclosure - I bought into the 'psy-op' angle somewhat before I knew the fuller picture).
Excellent critique of the standard "mUh cRiTiQuE" that will inevitably come for all the reasons you mentioned....mainly that we have collectively allowed ourselves to be conditioned to losing.
We must do the work individually and collectively to remove that self-defeating reflex.
Excellent appraisal, you've hit on every contentious point and settled it.
The Americans got it right with the 1 drop rule. But Christianity is the biggest anti white creation of all time.
'We are so accustomed to losing, we can’t believe it when something happens in our favour, so we invent reasons as to why it is actually a trick.'
Yes thats bang on, and echoes Houllebecq talking about French Catholics/conservatives.
I wont bother watching the movie having seen the standout scene (the wipeout) on Black Pilled's stream earlier this week.
Like yourself he thought it was a case of the good outweighing the bad overall.
My review : https://ghazibenahmed.substack.com/p/citizen-vigilante-or-the-anger-no?r=4ukxmm&utm_medium=ios
QED. Excellent analysis as ever! Thank you. Oddly, Red Ice have fallen for the 'fraudulent movie' take on CV. A shame because they may have put some of their esteemed viewers off. I hope not. I would only add that once you allow the nationalist genie out of the bottle there's no knowing what positive chaos he may generate. Forces ultimately beyond the elite's control will bring about their demise. The truth will out - not because it's virtuous, but because that's what truth does. Truth loves to foil humans. It's the ultimate trickster!
Running cover for 1/8thers now are we, bro? You'll be kissing the wall next.
Oh I know I shouldn't rise to the bait(!) but surely being a so-called 1/8-ther is preferable to having 1/8 of a brain? Why are you even on this page?
My article in the same topic :
https://ghazibenahmed.substack.com/p/citizen-vigilante-or-the-anger-no?r=4ukxmm&utm_medium=ios
more than one thing can and usually is true at one and the same time. Mixed bag but it does raise tensions, especially amongst the young and those easy to manipulate, especially amongst the target audiences.
Two questions need to be asked of all things and at all times, qui bono? Follow the money. If you can answer those two questions as best you are able and thinking logically and rationally, then you have probably come closer to the truth than most are capable of. It just might be that it's not all of the truth, but as much of it as can be discerned. Nick Griffin has done his own analysis of this film and the questions which surround it. It might be worth viewing in and of itself
off topic but the odyssey - was it made to get people to hate wokism?
They don't just want immigrants dead though they want us dead too don't forget that. They obviously envisage a very chaotic state where all enemies of the state are neutralised. But generally I think it's hilarious that the traditional enemy is exposing himself as what he is and always has been. So much for muh multiculturalism LMAO
I've only seen the clip where the gunman takes out the migrants or whatever they are. I do know the actors who played these roles didn't do it because they wanted to get deported or have anyone who is brown deported either. I don't know what their motives were exactly - a payday? More films where they are hunted down? Their own revenge film? I wonder how many of the audience will take the side of the migrants in the film? 'They were brave to take on the role.' 'I want to see them in more stuff where I see a positive side to their culture, because this just paints a negative view.'
Why do we need friendly billionaires? The budget for CV was $2m. Much of this would have been actor fees (25%) and staff fees (50%).
The professional film level digital cameras, like a Sony FX6 or Komodo (entry options) costs £3-400 per week. Or £5-10k to buy / resell.
In our orbit must be enough talented people to reduce the wages to zero, with possible kickbacks if it makes money. I've met film school folks, actors etc at events. They're out there. It only requires a decent plot / script and a judicious use of non-expensive locations. Something which hits the right momentary Zeitgeist. Then the skill to film it with good momentum. Therefore, but.
If this could have happened, it would have happened. I can only think of one film that emerged from our sphere, and it is badly made with bad writing and bad acting. That is what you get for free. You're lucky even to get that; most people, if they aren't getting paid to do something, tend to always find there is something more pressing they need to be doing instead. This is why you need to pay people, which is why you need funding.
This is doubly true when you are asking people (especially actors) to become associated with something that will destroy their chances of a mainstream career.
Or make 5-15 minutes showcases. Like a poem versus a novel, it forces everything to be condensed, stripping out the superfluous, meandering tat.
Very well put! Let's for a moment reverse the situation and imagine some cultural marxist in 1950 make a 2022 Netflix historical drama with a gay disabled black knight and all the other tokens. He had actually wanted to change the culture subtly by introducing just a friendly black side character and letting the White Knight overstate his case too much so it would sound ridiculous. But when the other subversives saw he was about to cast several popular heterosexual movie stars and use German filmcameras and show the film in goy theatres and use national goy film distributors, he agreed to their demands, and they updated their demands and he had to include the gay, then the black, then the disabled, shoot it on Chinese gear in Palestine, include feminism and veganism in easy language and have the crusader knight give a land acknowledgement speech before felating his way into Jerusalem. In the end the movie somehow bombed and no one knew why - after all it contained all the marks of true leftist beliefs...
More strategically speaking: in the past decades White advocates were so used to get instantly cancelled that many erroneously thought their input needed to be like a hand granade, fast, small, comprehensively containing propellant and projectiles, blasting 360 degrees, applicable to all targets. But now that we are about to attain political and institutional power this strategy is very wrong. We will soon have access to millions of normie minds for prolonged periods of time (ideally via the national broadcasters that should not be defunded or scrapped but taken over) that a gradual approach will work the miracle. Ten movies undermining the current axiom on the topic, another ten introducing a different view, another ten showing the ideological conflict, another ten putting our arguments into the mouths of the pretty and good characters, and so on. And the normie herd will slowly veer into our direction and trample all our enemies with their conformist zeal.
I haven't seen, and am unlikely to ever watch, the film. FWIW, I agree with what you've written. Too many people hear the phrase 'psy-op', and get a dopamine hit. Sometimes, powerful people just want to make a buck, and that's all there is to it. A good example would be Graham Hancock's 'Ancient Apocalypse' documentary series.
Much was made about it being a Netflix production. The implication was that 'they' are trying to steer us a particular direction. But there really just seems to be an organic interest in the obvious flaws in current archaeological narratives (exact details aside).
(Edit: oh and full disclosure - I bought into the 'psy-op' angle somewhat before I knew the fuller picture).
Great last line!
Excellent critique of the standard "mUh cRiTiQuE" that will inevitably come for all the reasons you mentioned....mainly that we have collectively allowed ourselves to be conditioned to losing.
We must do the work individually and collectively to remove that self-defeating reflex.