The 2025 Audit on Muslim Rape Gangs
Another year, another report about brown men gang-raping White children. However, this particular report does “move the narrative forwards” considerably. It establishes several things that progressives desperately didn’t want established.
Before we get to those things, let us first acknowledge the absurdity of a world in which we have to rely on official reports to tell us things that we know - or should know - by common sense. Until yesterday, educated middle-class people were seriously pretending to believe (since no official report told them otherwise) that White men are more “rapey” than Pakistani men. I ask, does that even sound likely? Observe the body language, mannerisms and attitudes of Pakistani men and declare that you genuinely think they are probably less likely to rape than White men. Well, many progressives did exactly that. They were aided in this self-delusion by data that had obviously been distorted - a fact now established by this new report - but they didn’t care that it had obviously been distorted, because it helped them to delude themselves and thus think well of themselves.
Reliance on official “data” can be, during times of institutional corruption, a terrible weakness. It means the surrendering of common sense to officialdom, and that officialdom can declare things which are obviously untrue but will be taken as gospel.
And yet, on this particular issue, perhaps because it is so monstrous, the truth finds ways of creeping through all the lying and obfuscation. It is happening very slowly, but it is happening. The government, police and media (yes, many heads should roll…) tried to prevent it, but theirs is a Sisyphean struggle against reality.
Now for the things established by the new report:
ethnic data about these crimes is largely absent, due to police negligence. In 66% of cases, the accused’s ethnicity is not recorded.
even in this “curated” data, Pakistanis are hugely over-represented (they are 4% of Rotherham’s population but 64% of its suspects in child sexual abuse) and White British hugely under-represented (86% of population but only 22% of suspects)
there have been widespread cover-ups by media, government, police, judiciary, schools, social work departments, and even churches. Virtually all of the institutions of British civic life are implicated.
a full national inquiry should be conducted. This recommendation has been “accepted” by the Government, finally doing what should have been done 11 years ago by the Conservative government (or, more truthfully, 25 years ago by the New Labour government).
with that national inquiry in mind, police forces should be ordered not to destroy records (implying that they otherwise would, which indicates how corrupt the report’s writer believes Britain’s police forces to be)
It is worth giving some details of the cover-ups.
We learn how a previous report (from just seven months ago!) skewed its data outrageously. It excluded offenders of “unknown” ethnicity so that White men were 88% of the remaining total, when including the “unknowns” (as a separate category) makes White men only 28% of the actual total.
We learn of the staggering difference between two reports on the ethnicity breakdown of offenders in “group-based child sexual exploitation” cases. COCAD 2023 says that “Asians” (eg. Pakistani Muslims) are only 7% of offenders nationwide. An investigation by Greater Manchester Police says that, within that area, it is 54%. Admittedly this is for two different areas, but the discrepancy is unbelievable. Moreover, the 7% is contradicted by other data in this new report, which notes that COCAD knew the ethnicity of only 34% of offenders.
The report also admonishes a Home Office (!) report from 2020 which made the startling declaration:
it seems most likely that the ethnicity of group-based CSE offenders is in line with… the general population, with the majority of offenders being White.
The report notes that this quickly became “received truth”, quoted extensively in the media and other official reports. (No doubt some of my readers will have had it quoted to them by smug progressives when attempting to discuss this matter on social media.) But the report says:
this audit found it hard to understand how the Home Office paper reached that conclusion, which does not seem to be evidenced in research or data.
It seems that the Home Office simply made it up, not merely without evidence but actually in ardent defiance of the evidence.
These are just three examples of the “cooking of books” that has been done in order to obscure the truth and cover up this atrocity.
