The UN is just the policeman in the film 'The Wicker Man'. If the process does not 'benefit (in the future) some particular group who are engineering it (in the present)', one wonders as to the objective since a slaughtered cow cannot continue to be milked.
Hmm, thinking of the legal consequences of the great replacement is an interesting topic. I think that because the great replacement is a multifaceted phenomenon, it probably violates several laws instead of just one singular law. I know you were teasing out the idea of "ethnic treason", but I wonder if that would actually be covered by old-fashioned high treason? I would have to read Matthew Hale again to check the various species of high treason he classified, but I believe that the most extreme cases of supporting the great replacement would have been considered high treason in the 1680s. I also wonder if sedition laws would not only have protected the king's dignity, but the kingdom's dignity, including the loyal subjects thereof. Thus genocidal language against his Majesty's loyal subjects (White Brits) would be illegal under sedition laws. There was also the laws about praemunire, where it was illegal to assert foreign sovereignty other than the king. While the context was with the English monarchy fighting the pope in Rome, this makes us forget that the law was written against any assertion of foreign sovereignty, not just the Roman Church. This means that praemunire laws could be used against globalist organizations.
Interesting. I've been intending to look into the old sedition law for some time, having read of it in the course of writing about the old blasphemy law. These are things to pick up on.
Oh, and whilst I think of it, Woes what are your thoughts on these Statues Of Random Fat Black Women Popping Up Worldwide?! I thought it was a joke at first but, my goodness it is actually happening!
Your view of the state as ethno-state is very limited. Britain has 4 indigenous ethnicities: English, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish. Historically the English were dominant and favoured over the others to the point that the United Kingdom was equated with England. Would you consider that the English were committing a slow genocide by moving into Scotland and Wales and assimilating the locals ?
Spain is another multi-ethnic state in Europe with the Castilians being the dominant ethnicity. Again would you consider that the Castilians were committing a slow genocide of the Basques and Catalans ?
In the Great Replacement several issues are amalgamated : the negrolatry of the cultural upper class which makes the problems raised by the Caribbean blacks unmanageable and confuse and sometimes repulse the African blacks; the corporate love of upper caste Indians; the incomprehensible dislike of yet invitation to Pakistanis, Bengalis, and Afghanis. I also believe the servility towards the USA plays a role though I do not discern the mechanics.
It is no doubt that this genocide by replacement of European peoples is orchestrated by a single people group, one that is itself committing overt genocide right now and fuelling the refugee influx into European nations via displacement. An ethno religious supremacist group that views all others outside their group as subhuman. Of course I speak of the small hat tribe, who like Kalergi, Spectre and Soros and many others of their ilk who have funded, lobbied, and facilitated mass migration of third worlders to the west. They directly benefit as they gain greater prestige, power and influence on the world stage, weaken their enemies on all fronts and also destroy any opposition to their position as the "Chosen" class. They are also nearly immune from criticism as they hide their true group allegiance behind the illusion of being of European descent and nationality, and playing the eternal victim because of the fabricated Holocaust narrative.
The problem, of course, is that regimes now willfully ignore and violate their own laws. Tweaking statutes and definitions will not assure enforcement. From memory and by way of example, "refugees" are required to seek asylum in the first country where they arrive. Western countries, for the most part, do not bother even with the charade of checking if that has happened prior to admission. Short of revolution, mass civil disobedience is the only theoretical way to stop this hideous crime, and States will empower the savages and their enablers to answer peaceful protests with violence if demonstrations ever threaten the status quo ante. I would like to think this ends well but that requires lying to myself. We will win but at great cost, I fear.
One reaon I liked Dune when I read it in my teens: it's set in a scifi future where everyone accepts the primacy of genetics, of race. My guess is that if humanity survives & develops, they will look back on men like Ed Dutton the way we look at Galileo, and the progs who think the only difference between e.g. you & David Lammy is "just skin colour" will seem risibly ignorant, superstitious fools who trusted a corrupt media over common sense & the evidence of their own eyes. And then races will be understood to manifest different aspects of human potential.
We could start by getting the UN to recognize the Europeans as indigenous. The UN currently believes the only indigenous group in Europe are the Sami (who migrated from Asia 7000+ years after the "White" EHGs - ancestors of modern Swedes - were already living there!)
The UK will be at what I consider the tipping point in another 30-40 years- when the muslim population reaches 30%+- they will take over the government and force it on everyone remaining. They are organized at the family and street level- it will be ugly and it will be bloody but they will prevail because the modern British ethnic group has lost its will and means to survive.
Fighting against the Jewish globalist is obviously the main goal of anyone who wants to improve not just their own nation, but any nation. This must be done using methods of exposing this criminal race, and those who have decided to go along with it.
I have problems with the above laws that Woes has put forward. Firstly, it is putting the cart before the horse, because to implement such laws one needs to overthrow, or at least greatly weaken, the group who currently have power. If this is not done, any laws one might think up are utterly pointless.
Secondly, I am not keen on things such as “ethnic treason”, as it can make enemies of people who might otherwise join us in fighting Jewish power. Sorry to be going on about Jews, it is simply that once one understands that all of these problems have originated, and maintain by this group, there is zero point in pretending otherwise. Yes, other racial groups have now taken advantage of this, but they would never have been able to further their aims without the Jewish supremacists starting and maintaining the entire operation. My other issue with this “ethnic treason”, how could such a law be implemented? I gather this law is about couples who are from different racial backgrounds. People who have been brought up their entire lives in the system we currently live under, may well meet, fall in love and marry someone of a different racial background, was this a deliberate criminal act on their part? They are not criminals, because as I think we have firmly established the governments, and their true masters, are the ones who a) brought in millions of non-Europeans, and b) lied to the nation by informing and educating people that the entire things was “great and good”. So we can dismiss this as anything that could apply to people who have grown up in the world as it is today, and I say that regardless of how damaging it may well be. Again the government are criminal here.
In addition to the subject of “ethnic treason”, people could be presented, educated if you prefer, to the reality of racial differences. Also, most people do tend to marry within their own racial groups. There are some parts of the world where Europe meets Asia where there would indeed be some overlap, therefore if you have millions of people from different backgrounds living amongst you, you have similar conditions a fact that cannot be rationalised away. Thankfully there is now a growing number of people who finally understand that destroying Jewish power is by far the most important issue facing humanity, and has been for thousands of years.
Armed with a correct understanding of the above tactics and strategies must be thought upon by all people who wish to fight the criminal race who has placed themselves separate and above the nations of the world. To lay the groundwork for this, people must spread factual information that exposes the enemy of humanity. As things currently stand things are progressing quite well in this regard. Remember, we cannot undo the events of the past, we may have to come to accept that even if some level of control is one day placed into the hands of nationalist, it will be nations that will never quite be as White as they once were.
Thanks must go to Woes for his continued research and hard work in producing these writings that we read each week.
Regimes violate a plethora of laws even now when they admit illegals or "refugees." Mao's admonition that all power comes from the barrel of a gun cannot be denied. Rule of Law died long ago. Civil society was an early casualty of multi-racial, multi-cultural states, which quickly became lawless terror states.
MW, this entire series is the most important writing you have ever done. Congratulation for doing it.
The UN is just the policeman in the film 'The Wicker Man'. If the process does not 'benefit (in the future) some particular group who are engineering it (in the present)', one wonders as to the objective since a slaughtered cow cannot continue to be milked.
White people lost their survival instinct and they can’t pin that on anyone but themselves.
Hmm, thinking of the legal consequences of the great replacement is an interesting topic. I think that because the great replacement is a multifaceted phenomenon, it probably violates several laws instead of just one singular law. I know you were teasing out the idea of "ethnic treason", but I wonder if that would actually be covered by old-fashioned high treason? I would have to read Matthew Hale again to check the various species of high treason he classified, but I believe that the most extreme cases of supporting the great replacement would have been considered high treason in the 1680s. I also wonder if sedition laws would not only have protected the king's dignity, but the kingdom's dignity, including the loyal subjects thereof. Thus genocidal language against his Majesty's loyal subjects (White Brits) would be illegal under sedition laws. There was also the laws about praemunire, where it was illegal to assert foreign sovereignty other than the king. While the context was with the English monarchy fighting the pope in Rome, this makes us forget that the law was written against any assertion of foreign sovereignty, not just the Roman Church. This means that praemunire laws could be used against globalist organizations.
Interesting. I've been intending to look into the old sedition law for some time, having read of it in the course of writing about the old blasphemy law. These are things to pick up on.
Oh, and whilst I think of it, Woes what are your thoughts on these Statues Of Random Fat Black Women Popping Up Worldwide?! I thought it was a joke at first but, my goodness it is actually happening!
Hi MW,
Your view of the state as ethno-state is very limited. Britain has 4 indigenous ethnicities: English, Scottish, Welsh, and Irish. Historically the English were dominant and favoured over the others to the point that the United Kingdom was equated with England. Would you consider that the English were committing a slow genocide by moving into Scotland and Wales and assimilating the locals ?
Spain is another multi-ethnic state in Europe with the Castilians being the dominant ethnicity. Again would you consider that the Castilians were committing a slow genocide of the Basques and Catalans ?
In the Great Replacement several issues are amalgamated : the negrolatry of the cultural upper class which makes the problems raised by the Caribbean blacks unmanageable and confuse and sometimes repulse the African blacks; the corporate love of upper caste Indians; the incomprehensible dislike of yet invitation to Pakistanis, Bengalis, and Afghanis. I also believe the servility towards the USA plays a role though I do not discern the mechanics.
One of the most insidious aspects is the leftist moral argument that this is punishment for past sins.
It is no doubt that this genocide by replacement of European peoples is orchestrated by a single people group, one that is itself committing overt genocide right now and fuelling the refugee influx into European nations via displacement. An ethno religious supremacist group that views all others outside their group as subhuman. Of course I speak of the small hat tribe, who like Kalergi, Spectre and Soros and many others of their ilk who have funded, lobbied, and facilitated mass migration of third worlders to the west. They directly benefit as they gain greater prestige, power and influence on the world stage, weaken their enemies on all fronts and also destroy any opposition to their position as the "Chosen" class. They are also nearly immune from criticism as they hide their true group allegiance behind the illusion of being of European descent and nationality, and playing the eternal victim because of the fabricated Holocaust narrative.
Jews are so powerful they can pull off the great replacement and white people are so weak that they would fall for it
The problem, of course, is that regimes now willfully ignore and violate their own laws. Tweaking statutes and definitions will not assure enforcement. From memory and by way of example, "refugees" are required to seek asylum in the first country where they arrive. Western countries, for the most part, do not bother even with the charade of checking if that has happened prior to admission. Short of revolution, mass civil disobedience is the only theoretical way to stop this hideous crime, and States will empower the savages and their enablers to answer peaceful protests with violence if demonstrations ever threaten the status quo ante. I would like to think this ends well but that requires lying to myself. We will win but at great cost, I fear.
One reaon I liked Dune when I read it in my teens: it's set in a scifi future where everyone accepts the primacy of genetics, of race. My guess is that if humanity survives & develops, they will look back on men like Ed Dutton the way we look at Galileo, and the progs who think the only difference between e.g. you & David Lammy is "just skin colour" will seem risibly ignorant, superstitious fools who trusted a corrupt media over common sense & the evidence of their own eyes. And then races will be understood to manifest different aspects of human potential.
We could start by getting the UN to recognize the Europeans as indigenous. The UN currently believes the only indigenous group in Europe are the Sami (who migrated from Asia 7000+ years after the "White" EHGs - ancestors of modern Swedes - were already living there!)
The UK will be at what I consider the tipping point in another 30-40 years- when the muslim population reaches 30%+- they will take over the government and force it on everyone remaining. They are organized at the family and street level- it will be ugly and it will be bloody but they will prevail because the modern British ethnic group has lost its will and means to survive.
The great replacement is demographic warfare and already illegal under international law...
Fighting against the Jewish globalist is obviously the main goal of anyone who wants to improve not just their own nation, but any nation. This must be done using methods of exposing this criminal race, and those who have decided to go along with it.
I have problems with the above laws that Woes has put forward. Firstly, it is putting the cart before the horse, because to implement such laws one needs to overthrow, or at least greatly weaken, the group who currently have power. If this is not done, any laws one might think up are utterly pointless.
Secondly, I am not keen on things such as “ethnic treason”, as it can make enemies of people who might otherwise join us in fighting Jewish power. Sorry to be going on about Jews, it is simply that once one understands that all of these problems have originated, and maintain by this group, there is zero point in pretending otherwise. Yes, other racial groups have now taken advantage of this, but they would never have been able to further their aims without the Jewish supremacists starting and maintaining the entire operation. My other issue with this “ethnic treason”, how could such a law be implemented? I gather this law is about couples who are from different racial backgrounds. People who have been brought up their entire lives in the system we currently live under, may well meet, fall in love and marry someone of a different racial background, was this a deliberate criminal act on their part? They are not criminals, because as I think we have firmly established the governments, and their true masters, are the ones who a) brought in millions of non-Europeans, and b) lied to the nation by informing and educating people that the entire things was “great and good”. So we can dismiss this as anything that could apply to people who have grown up in the world as it is today, and I say that regardless of how damaging it may well be. Again the government are criminal here.
In addition to the subject of “ethnic treason”, people could be presented, educated if you prefer, to the reality of racial differences. Also, most people do tend to marry within their own racial groups. There are some parts of the world where Europe meets Asia where there would indeed be some overlap, therefore if you have millions of people from different backgrounds living amongst you, you have similar conditions a fact that cannot be rationalised away. Thankfully there is now a growing number of people who finally understand that destroying Jewish power is by far the most important issue facing humanity, and has been for thousands of years.
Armed with a correct understanding of the above tactics and strategies must be thought upon by all people who wish to fight the criminal race who has placed themselves separate and above the nations of the world. To lay the groundwork for this, people must spread factual information that exposes the enemy of humanity. As things currently stand things are progressing quite well in this regard. Remember, we cannot undo the events of the past, we may have to come to accept that even if some level of control is one day placed into the hands of nationalist, it will be nations that will never quite be as White as they once were.
Thanks must go to Woes for his continued research and hard work in producing these writings that we read each week.
Regimes violate a plethora of laws even now when they admit illegals or "refugees." Mao's admonition that all power comes from the barrel of a gun cannot be denied. Rule of Law died long ago. Civil society was an early casualty of multi-racial, multi-cultural states, which quickly became lawless terror states.