did anybody else notice that the advertisement for the green party shows mainly white people? What are these people? surely not representative of the party? The propaganda is thick.
When a majority of white women change their perspective, and expect us white men to actually do something about this intollerable situtaion, the conflict will come swiftly.
Right now, one thing that is holding that dam back, is the social welfare state and the increasing diminishing returns in the popular culture sphere, Disney movies being unprofitable, ham-fisted social engineering etc.. For about the next five historical minutes, an illusion is cast over how dire the situtation is. It is sustaining- just.
I have no doubt however, that once these artficial social bulkheads collapse, there will be a snap reaction of women to demand something entirely different. A restoration of their people, in their own lands, to ways of life that make sense and feel right. The effort to hide and distort this fundamanetal feminine drive has basically bankrupted the West, through the Protected Class economy and the counter-intuitive DEI policies now found in academia and the corporate world.
When you see the trickle of women becoming based turn into a stream... start banging out those pushups and joining active clubs. Of course you could lessen the shock and do it now, but that is not really how mass psychology works, unfortunately.
Feminine needs for comfort, safety and predicatbility drives civilization. Men are the executors of their will. And we are very close to the point where men and women are united in recognizing a threat to their very existence. Men tend to be more paranoid. They see their chances of getting laid a few moves ahead, and see these things coming. A majority of men are already with "us" and see that the need for action is nigh. The biggest block that is going to join us though, are formerly leftist, or even "woke" women. The biggest dynamic shift in the polls and politics will be that ancient, unchanging factor. We have already seen the sustained, maximized result of social engineering, and it has failed to take hold. We didn't get mass interracial couplings, or acceptance as Mosques to be "normal". Now that immense effort is going broke before our eyes, in part blown to pieces by Russian and Iranian missiles, but also failure after failure of media "product" like Lawd Them Rangsz ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJOIPiEkcx4&list=RDFJOIPiEkcx4&start_radio=1 ).
There will be a reversion to the historical and biological mean.
He does. Not a Zionist, but in common with his kind he prioritises undermining the host population. Which happens to be what the 'British' establishment wants as well.
Great article! I often wonder what would make all the people who don't vote, vote? The 40%. Why don't they vote?
Presumably because they feel it's pointless? Maybe, just maybe, a party that states unashamedly that they stand for indigenous white, British people and will work to ensure their demographic security would be popular. Lets face it, no-one without a skinhead, bovver boots and a regrettable propensity for violence and hate-filled rhetoric has ever offered that before. Surely we can have self-preservation without thuggish xenophobia.
Agreed. Any government attempting to regain control of our country needs to first build up the army and the navy and the police force. Of course the latter needs to be re-trained as well 🤦🏼♀️
I wonder if we'll look back at the Boriswave as the thing that broke the Pakistani Rape Gangs.
Short answer:
The more immigrants in an area, the more likely it is to flip from Labour to a Gaza independent, or to the Greens, or to a future party.
Black- or White Pill:
The Muslim populations could become powerful enough that the Rape Gangs become a liability for them.
Long answer:
When it comes to the Rape Gangs, Labour is the Senior Partner. The Pakistanis have the prostitution rings, but Labour has the police, social workers, councillors etc... needed to protect them.
The 5 or 6 digits of (mostly) English girls were a bribe to get and keep them voting for Labour, and to prevent integration
The arrangement began when the UK was above 90% (if not 95%) native British, so there was still passive pressure to integrate, and Labour could not allow that. Remember, back in the 1970's (the latest that it could have started), Labour was dealing with the 1st wave of immigrants who:
a) could have access to wealth back home.
b) did not (yet) have the habit of relying on the Dole when unemployed.
c) if allowed to form friendships with the native English, could use that wealth (real or imagined) to support the unemployed English - and rob the DWP (equivalent) of a patron-client relationship.
No local council in the 1970's had the resources or manpower to investigate how much the potential wealth that they could bring from Pakistan. Therefore, Labour sought ways to neutralise the effect of this wealth, real or imagined.
Supporting the rape gangs drove a wedge between the Pakistanis and the native English.
At one point, a Pakistani-run pimping ring expected to get arrested and imprisoned... and were shocked when they did not.
Allowing non-native Brits to claim benefits was just another means to fulfil the same ends.
Furthermore, sowing distrust between the Pakistanis and English also made sure that a local trade union did not make common cause with an equivalent body in Pakistan, and thereby circumvent the control of the National Trade Unions.
Both the Gangs and the Benefits are actually forms of Pakistani containment. They are/were organised enough to make it all this way, so they could be organised enough to establish actual governance over an area.
The English Girls were a Labour strategy to make them porn-brained. We know they gave many of the girls drugs, so some of them must have been taking drugs also, contributing to lower mental capacity across both English and Pakistani communities.
The Benefits encouraged a Higher Time Preference and discouraged garden agriculture.
I expect to outlive the National Grid - and by extension the global supply chain and international travel. When that happens, the Pakistanis will be much harder hit by the cold winters, and total lack of farming experience. At that point also, the higher IQ and more able-bodied among them will be able to flee back home, making those that remain even more vulnerable to the cold.
When the Grid goes down, the non-White populations will dwindle out of existence within a few generations. Pre-Windrush geographic genetic continuity will, regardless, take many more generations to re-establish, even barring a neo-Heptarchy situation of strong internal borders.
That is truly a fascinating perspective on the relationship between the Pakistani rape gangs and the UK Labour Party. This view isn't of merely opportunistic evil and cowardice, but of the fully pre-meditated sacrifice of entire swathes of the English and other British populations in exchange for political power.
I am starting to wonder if any Pakistani gang leaders - on some level - wanted Labour to withdraw its protection because it made their underlings difficult to control?
In Elite Theory terms, Labour created a High-Low mechanism against the Middle.
The Labour-controlled local governments are the High; the rank-and-file gang members are the Low, and the Gang Leaders were the Middle.
In this arrangement, Labour’s #1 priority was to keep the gangs under their thumb, which is easier if the leaders have to spend time and energy keeping the heavies under control.
Great summary of what turned out to be an interesting by-election, lots to say about it. Agree Labour are the biggest losers. It's amazing to see the language about 'Stirring division' (usually reserved for the right) turned to his left by Starmer, blaming George Galloway for endorsing the greens. It's a shame we didn't get to see Burnham run, if a strong candidate still couldn't win for Labour (I suspect he would have lost) then that would have been even more revealing.
Regarding 'family voting', the thing worth talking about is the media giving it coverage. I remember someone telling me about it years ago, I don't think I was surprised to learn of it at the time. My assumption was that the families were told how to vote at home or in the mosque, the fact that some of them are just brazen (and/or thick) enough to do it in the polling station is a revelation.
Regarding the Tories and Reform, amazing they think they can continue to support Israel and win any of the Muslim vote. The left-Islamic alliance could probably merit an essay in itself. I remember last year some people getting excited about that clip from Tower Hamlets, where a Bangladeshi lad told a libtard that they were definitely not on the same side. While I'm in no doubt that the contradictions means the alliance is destined to break at some point, in the short term it has held spectacularly in this election. The folks at the Telegraph can scoff about how could socially conservative Muslims vote for loony leftists, but that's the current reality. My assumption is the Muslims just think 'yeah, all that gay stuff is for you people and doesn't apply for us', though I don't know for sure.
Your article from last year 'The Left is Done' came up under this one, Woes have your thoughts changed on that much since? You may well be right long term, but right now it feels the Centre is done rather than the left.
The legalised drugs and prostitution stuff is neither here nor there for the Muslims - they follow sharia, not our laws. They’ll get rich of the trade in both in any case.
This strikes me as a straight forward case of a distinct group voting for the party that promises them the most perks and otherwise governing themselves as they always have done.
Yes. It's a shame that Burnham didn't run and lose. He's their Newsome. Neutralising him as the representative of the ft globalist class would be very useful in the short to medium term.
A lot of good points made but as usual we are all just talking in circles which of course suits those doing this to us to an absolute "T". The proverbial doo doo is going to have to hit the fan before anything really changes.
As I've said before I think Restore Britain is worth a punt but those in power are determined that we have a civil war so they can clamp down on all sides and I can't see it being avoided. They need damaged buildings and infrastructure so they can enslave the people that are left via their bank loans etc to "Build Back Better" just as they did after WW2. That of course assumes they can keep control of it all as it unravels and I also doubt they are going to be able to do that.
When even the printed money runs out and there is no gas and electricity then hardy genes come to the fore as this is not South Africa where the country can collapse and no-one freezes to death or starves though South Africa is well on the way to starving and poor whites there have been starved on purpose by the ANC for at least a decade now as they are not seen as worthy of having any taxpayer funds spent on them.
I think where politics fails, largely due to misplaced "caring" by women voters spending other people's taxes it must be said, the weather in the UK is probably going to succeed. If I had a choice of being poor in the freezing, wet, dull, windy UK or being poor in lovely warm India or Pakistan etc etc etc then guess where I'm going to head off to if I or my parents come from those places.
You know it is bad when our last hope of avoiding the rivers of blood planned for us by "our betters" may well be total financial collapse and the God awful British weather.
But it taps into a deeper issue our masters ignore at their peril. We evolved to live here; the imports didn't. Perhaps as you suggest that will come to matter. Perhaps populations are not interchangeable after all.
Yes I think transplanted populations of anything can survive for a while, quite a while in some cases but I have a feeling that something ensures they die out so that we maintain maximum diversity. You don't maintain maximum diversity by taking rabbits to Australia for example as a primary school child could tell you they have out competed many of the indigenous animal species there and brought them near to extinction. Imported populations of different species are by far the greatest threat to indigenous species as we have known for around 100 years now i.e. we learned that just around the time "our betters" hit on the idea of bringing in other people's. As my brother a PhD microbiologist likes to say those who support classic Darwinism tend to be those that know least about what it actually says and also those that know least about how genes etc work. I have a feeling that "place" plays a far larger part in the creatures that live there in that place than modern "science" cares to admit. Sadly "science" is full of agendas these days more than it is full of actual scientifc rigour. People used to think that the material world is an illusion and that for example if you piled up straw in a corner of a room mice would spontaneously arise in the pile. Modern quantum mechanics states that what we think creates what is around us so perhaps those "backward" people from the past knew something most of us have forgotten. People remember the Montauk experiments in the US during the fifties as being about mind manipulation i.e. brainwashing etc but a huge chunk of the work there was on creating things out of nothing, like mice in a pile of straw you might say. When push comes to shove the very fabric of reality may move and God help anyone who is not where they should be when that happens because I won't. It is strange that in one of the classic sci-fi films of the fifties "Forbidden Planet" Morpheous whose mind had been greatly expanded bythe Krell machine was able to use it to create an image of his daughter just as they were allegedly doing in Montauk at that time with chairs and other inanimate objects and whilst they tended to drift off back into the aether in the early experiments they found out how to make them permanent. Similarly seemingly permanent things could be made to just ......... disappear.
Summary: a Green Party (*of Ireland*) member, who is neither British nor Irish, travelled to Manchester to work on the Gorton & Denton by-election. She also has zero links with Manchester. There is no standard that they will not turn into a double-standard.
💯 and well said. the balkanisation and destruction of the D-UK and it's native population is proceeding ahead as intended.
Regrettably, I no longer believe that there is an exclusively political solution to our ills.
The non-natives are fully aware of this and in certain instances are preparing for such.
The natives have been gaslit and coerced for many decades and in the main have become demoralised, apathetic, and disinterested. We have become turkeys celebrating Christmas. As for a mass populist political movement/s. I don't think that for various reasons, including those mentioned above, that there will be a majority population concensus acheived by the natives, at least. Not until after the dust has settled and the war has been long won, or lost. Just look at the American War of Independence as an example of such. There probably won't even be a plurality achieved before then either.
I think that what is needed, is the formation of a small active, highly capable, well organised, funded, and genuinely patriotic dedicated elite. This elite will needs to attract a sufficiently sized cadre of others to themselves, along with funding, training and provisioning, in order to offer a credible alternative and deterrent to other hostile groups and ideologies. All of which takes time, capital and resources, which are all in short supply.
I think that it's an uphill and long-slog ahead of us, but not insurmountable, their will be no quick or easy fixes, for what has been inflicted upon us by quislings, traitors, Oikophobes, Xenophiles and invaders. But with determination, grit, effort and a lot of suffering and sacrifices, and God's help, we may just get there in time. though many alive today probably won't see that future. I think that it is a multi-generational undertaking, akin to the Reconquista in Spain.
May God bless, guide and protect you and all of us. Deus Vult 🙏 ✝️ 🏴 🇬🇧 🏴 🏴 🇮🇪
The invaders amounted to a small percentage of the Spanish population in Moorish times. In Europe we have large scale population replacement. The situation is more similar to that of the American Indians which play a negligible role in their former lands.
I reread your post. If the analogy with the Reconquista is merely a long multi-generational effort then yes. But the Reconquista was also backed by powerful outsiders such as France and the papacy. It relied on several cooperative independent kingdoms in the mountains. It is also the only case of a successful reconquest of a main country from it's its margins. The chances of the British successfully imitating it are slim, really slim.
Great article, Woes. Any reason for not mentioning the lib dems? I know they were irrelevant in Gorton & Denton - getting even fewer votes than the conservatives - but they did get a fair few seats in the general election. I’m not really sure what to make of them.
I agree with you that Polanski has permission from above to say what he says. Who benefits from having devout Muslims voting for a party which favours the legalisation and distribution of crack-cocaine to children and which is led by an openly gay Jew?
did anybody else notice that the advertisement for the green party shows mainly white people? What are these people? surely not representative of the party? The propaganda is thick.
When a majority of white women change their perspective, and expect us white men to actually do something about this intollerable situtaion, the conflict will come swiftly.
Right now, one thing that is holding that dam back, is the social welfare state and the increasing diminishing returns in the popular culture sphere, Disney movies being unprofitable, ham-fisted social engineering etc.. For about the next five historical minutes, an illusion is cast over how dire the situtation is. It is sustaining- just.
I have no doubt however, that once these artficial social bulkheads collapse, there will be a snap reaction of women to demand something entirely different. A restoration of their people, in their own lands, to ways of life that make sense and feel right. The effort to hide and distort this fundamanetal feminine drive has basically bankrupted the West, through the Protected Class economy and the counter-intuitive DEI policies now found in academia and the corporate world.
When you see the trickle of women becoming based turn into a stream... start banging out those pushups and joining active clubs. Of course you could lessen the shock and do it now, but that is not really how mass psychology works, unfortunately.
Feminine needs for comfort, safety and predicatbility drives civilization. Men are the executors of their will. And we are very close to the point where men and women are united in recognizing a threat to their very existence. Men tend to be more paranoid. They see their chances of getting laid a few moves ahead, and see these things coming. A majority of men are already with "us" and see that the need for action is nigh. The biggest block that is going to join us though, are formerly leftist, or even "woke" women. The biggest dynamic shift in the polls and politics will be that ancient, unchanging factor. We have already seen the sustained, maximized result of social engineering, and it has failed to take hold. We didn't get mass interracial couplings, or acceptance as Mosques to be "normal". Now that immense effort is going broke before our eyes, in part blown to pieces by Russian and Iranian missiles, but also failure after failure of media "product" like Lawd Them Rangsz ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJOIPiEkcx4&list=RDFJOIPiEkcx4&start_radio=1 ).
There will be a reversion to the historical and biological mean.
Unsurprisingly, Zack Polanski fits the "early life" pattern.
He does. Not a Zionist, but in common with his kind he prioritises undermining the host population. Which happens to be what the 'British' establishment wants as well.
It's such a shame Sir Oink-a-lot didn't get up. He was probably Britain's last hope.
"In a sane country, this would be two separate constituencies. In ours, we have to mix together (even while we, demonstrably, want to segregate)"
---
Every White person's problem right there.
Great article! I often wonder what would make all the people who don't vote, vote? The 40%. Why don't they vote?
Presumably because they feel it's pointless? Maybe, just maybe, a party that states unashamedly that they stand for indigenous white, British people and will work to ensure their demographic security would be popular. Lets face it, no-one without a skinhead, bovver boots and a regrettable propensity for violence and hate-filled rhetoric has ever offered that before. Surely we can have self-preservation without thuggish xenophobia.
I doubt we can have our country back without a period of at least moderate sustained violence. Look at Ballymena.
Agreed. Any government attempting to regain control of our country needs to first build up the army and the navy and the police force. Of course the latter needs to be re-trained as well 🤦🏼♀️
I agree, and I hope we're right.
I wonder if we'll look back at the Boriswave as the thing that broke the Pakistani Rape Gangs.
Short answer:
The more immigrants in an area, the more likely it is to flip from Labour to a Gaza independent, or to the Greens, or to a future party.
Black- or White Pill:
The Muslim populations could become powerful enough that the Rape Gangs become a liability for them.
Long answer:
When it comes to the Rape Gangs, Labour is the Senior Partner. The Pakistanis have the prostitution rings, but Labour has the police, social workers, councillors etc... needed to protect them.
The 5 or 6 digits of (mostly) English girls were a bribe to get and keep them voting for Labour, and to prevent integration
The arrangement began when the UK was above 90% (if not 95%) native British, so there was still passive pressure to integrate, and Labour could not allow that. Remember, back in the 1970's (the latest that it could have started), Labour was dealing with the 1st wave of immigrants who:
a) could have access to wealth back home.
b) did not (yet) have the habit of relying on the Dole when unemployed.
c) if allowed to form friendships with the native English, could use that wealth (real or imagined) to support the unemployed English - and rob the DWP (equivalent) of a patron-client relationship.
No local council in the 1970's had the resources or manpower to investigate how much the potential wealth that they could bring from Pakistan. Therefore, Labour sought ways to neutralise the effect of this wealth, real or imagined.
Supporting the rape gangs drove a wedge between the Pakistanis and the native English.
At one point, a Pakistani-run pimping ring expected to get arrested and imprisoned... and were shocked when they did not.
Allowing non-native Brits to claim benefits was just another means to fulfil the same ends.
Furthermore, sowing distrust between the Pakistanis and English also made sure that a local trade union did not make common cause with an equivalent body in Pakistan, and thereby circumvent the control of the National Trade Unions.
Both the Gangs and the Benefits are actually forms of Pakistani containment. They are/were organised enough to make it all this way, so they could be organised enough to establish actual governance over an area.
The English Girls were a Labour strategy to make them porn-brained. We know they gave many of the girls drugs, so some of them must have been taking drugs also, contributing to lower mental capacity across both English and Pakistani communities.
The Benefits encouraged a Higher Time Preference and discouraged garden agriculture.
I expect to outlive the National Grid - and by extension the global supply chain and international travel. When that happens, the Pakistanis will be much harder hit by the cold winters, and total lack of farming experience. At that point also, the higher IQ and more able-bodied among them will be able to flee back home, making those that remain even more vulnerable to the cold.
When the Grid goes down, the non-White populations will dwindle out of existence within a few generations. Pre-Windrush geographic genetic continuity will, regardless, take many more generations to re-establish, even barring a neo-Heptarchy situation of strong internal borders.
That is truly a fascinating perspective on the relationship between the Pakistani rape gangs and the UK Labour Party. This view isn't of merely opportunistic evil and cowardice, but of the fully pre-meditated sacrifice of entire swathes of the English and other British populations in exchange for political power.
Another development occurred to me.
I am starting to wonder if any Pakistani gang leaders - on some level - wanted Labour to withdraw its protection because it made their underlings difficult to control?
In Elite Theory terms, Labour created a High-Low mechanism against the Middle.
The Labour-controlled local governments are the High; the rank-and-file gang members are the Low, and the Gang Leaders were the Middle.
In this arrangement, Labour’s #1 priority was to keep the gangs under their thumb, which is easier if the leaders have to spend time and energy keeping the heavies under control.
Great summary of what turned out to be an interesting by-election, lots to say about it. Agree Labour are the biggest losers. It's amazing to see the language about 'Stirring division' (usually reserved for the right) turned to his left by Starmer, blaming George Galloway for endorsing the greens. It's a shame we didn't get to see Burnham run, if a strong candidate still couldn't win for Labour (I suspect he would have lost) then that would have been even more revealing.
Regarding 'family voting', the thing worth talking about is the media giving it coverage. I remember someone telling me about it years ago, I don't think I was surprised to learn of it at the time. My assumption was that the families were told how to vote at home or in the mosque, the fact that some of them are just brazen (and/or thick) enough to do it in the polling station is a revelation.
Regarding the Tories and Reform, amazing they think they can continue to support Israel and win any of the Muslim vote. The left-Islamic alliance could probably merit an essay in itself. I remember last year some people getting excited about that clip from Tower Hamlets, where a Bangladeshi lad told a libtard that they were definitely not on the same side. While I'm in no doubt that the contradictions means the alliance is destined to break at some point, in the short term it has held spectacularly in this election. The folks at the Telegraph can scoff about how could socially conservative Muslims vote for loony leftists, but that's the current reality. My assumption is the Muslims just think 'yeah, all that gay stuff is for you people and doesn't apply for us', though I don't know for sure.
Your article from last year 'The Left is Done' came up under this one, Woes have your thoughts changed on that much since? You may well be right long term, but right now it feels the Centre is done rather than the left.
The legalised drugs and prostitution stuff is neither here nor there for the Muslims - they follow sharia, not our laws. They’ll get rich of the trade in both in any case.
This strikes me as a straight forward case of a distinct group voting for the party that promises them the most perks and otherwise governing themselves as they always have done.
Yes I really think Gaza was the main issue that swung the Muslim vote to the Greens here, also maybe Labour's tougher talk on immigration reforms.
Yes. It's a shame that Burnham didn't run and lose. He's their Newsome. Neutralising him as the representative of the ft globalist class would be very useful in the short to medium term.
That's a good question. I definitely still think that, as I said in that essay, the Left are never going to get the world they want.
I can’t help but be reminded of Houellebecq's Submission and Islamo-leftism when I read this stuff.
Hmmmm reads a bit AI-ish. Hopefully not.
A lot of good points made but as usual we are all just talking in circles which of course suits those doing this to us to an absolute "T". The proverbial doo doo is going to have to hit the fan before anything really changes.
As I've said before I think Restore Britain is worth a punt but those in power are determined that we have a civil war so they can clamp down on all sides and I can't see it being avoided. They need damaged buildings and infrastructure so they can enslave the people that are left via their bank loans etc to "Build Back Better" just as they did after WW2. That of course assumes they can keep control of it all as it unravels and I also doubt they are going to be able to do that.
When even the printed money runs out and there is no gas and electricity then hardy genes come to the fore as this is not South Africa where the country can collapse and no-one freezes to death or starves though South Africa is well on the way to starving and poor whites there have been starved on purpose by the ANC for at least a decade now as they are not seen as worthy of having any taxpayer funds spent on them.
I think where politics fails, largely due to misplaced "caring" by women voters spending other people's taxes it must be said, the weather in the UK is probably going to succeed. If I had a choice of being poor in the freezing, wet, dull, windy UK or being poor in lovely warm India or Pakistan etc etc etc then guess where I'm going to head off to if I or my parents come from those places.
You know it is bad when our last hope of avoiding the rivers of blood planned for us by "our betters" may well be total financial collapse and the God awful British weather.
Absolutely none of this essay was written by AI.
But it taps into a deeper issue our masters ignore at their peril. We evolved to live here; the imports didn't. Perhaps as you suggest that will come to matter. Perhaps populations are not interchangeable after all.
Yes I think transplanted populations of anything can survive for a while, quite a while in some cases but I have a feeling that something ensures they die out so that we maintain maximum diversity. You don't maintain maximum diversity by taking rabbits to Australia for example as a primary school child could tell you they have out competed many of the indigenous animal species there and brought them near to extinction. Imported populations of different species are by far the greatest threat to indigenous species as we have known for around 100 years now i.e. we learned that just around the time "our betters" hit on the idea of bringing in other people's. As my brother a PhD microbiologist likes to say those who support classic Darwinism tend to be those that know least about what it actually says and also those that know least about how genes etc work. I have a feeling that "place" plays a far larger part in the creatures that live there in that place than modern "science" cares to admit. Sadly "science" is full of agendas these days more than it is full of actual scientifc rigour. People used to think that the material world is an illusion and that for example if you piled up straw in a corner of a room mice would spontaneously arise in the pile. Modern quantum mechanics states that what we think creates what is around us so perhaps those "backward" people from the past knew something most of us have forgotten. People remember the Montauk experiments in the US during the fifties as being about mind manipulation i.e. brainwashing etc but a huge chunk of the work there was on creating things out of nothing, like mice in a pile of straw you might say. When push comes to shove the very fabric of reality may move and God help anyone who is not where they should be when that happens because I won't. It is strange that in one of the classic sci-fi films of the fifties "Forbidden Planet" Morpheous whose mind had been greatly expanded bythe Krell machine was able to use it to create an image of his daughter just as they were allegedly doing in Montauk at that time with chairs and other inanimate objects and whilst they tended to drift off back into the aether in the early experiments they found out how to make them permanent. Similarly seemingly permanent things could be made to just ......... disappear.
I think that this (paywalled) article is worth sprinkling in here: https://archive.is/N5mpb
Summary: a Green Party (*of Ireland*) member, who is neither British nor Irish, travelled to Manchester to work on the Gorton & Denton by-election. She also has zero links with Manchester. There is no standard that they will not turn into a double-standard.
💯 and well said. the balkanisation and destruction of the D-UK and it's native population is proceeding ahead as intended.
Regrettably, I no longer believe that there is an exclusively political solution to our ills.
The non-natives are fully aware of this and in certain instances are preparing for such.
The natives have been gaslit and coerced for many decades and in the main have become demoralised, apathetic, and disinterested. We have become turkeys celebrating Christmas. As for a mass populist political movement/s. I don't think that for various reasons, including those mentioned above, that there will be a majority population concensus acheived by the natives, at least. Not until after the dust has settled and the war has been long won, or lost. Just look at the American War of Independence as an example of such. There probably won't even be a plurality achieved before then either.
I think that what is needed, is the formation of a small active, highly capable, well organised, funded, and genuinely patriotic dedicated elite. This elite will needs to attract a sufficiently sized cadre of others to themselves, along with funding, training and provisioning, in order to offer a credible alternative and deterrent to other hostile groups and ideologies. All of which takes time, capital and resources, which are all in short supply.
I think that it's an uphill and long-slog ahead of us, but not insurmountable, their will be no quick or easy fixes, for what has been inflicted upon us by quislings, traitors, Oikophobes, Xenophiles and invaders. But with determination, grit, effort and a lot of suffering and sacrifices, and God's help, we may just get there in time. though many alive today probably won't see that future. I think that it is a multi-generational undertaking, akin to the Reconquista in Spain.
May God bless, guide and protect you and all of us. Deus Vult 🙏 ✝️ 🏴 🇬🇧 🏴 🏴 🇮🇪
The invaders amounted to a small percentage of the Spanish population in Moorish times. In Europe we have large scale population replacement. The situation is more similar to that of the American Indians which play a negligible role in their former lands.
I'd suggest that you read again.
I reread your post. If the analogy with the Reconquista is merely a long multi-generational effort then yes. But the Reconquista was also backed by powerful outsiders such as France and the papacy. It relied on several cooperative independent kingdoms in the mountains. It is also the only case of a successful reconquest of a main country from it's its margins. The chances of the British successfully imitating it are slim, really slim.
Perhaps, perhaps not. Personally I disagree with your assessments
Great article, Woes. Any reason for not mentioning the lib dems? I know they were irrelevant in Gorton & Denton - getting even fewer votes than the conservatives - but they did get a fair few seats in the general election. I’m not really sure what to make of them.
I couldn't think of anything to say about the LibDems! I think they will be more relevant elsewhere, though.
I agree with you that Polanski has permission from above to say what he says. Who benefits from having devout Muslims voting for a party which favours the legalisation and distribution of crack-cocaine to children and which is led by an openly gay Jew?