Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AdamH2900's avatar

I greatly appreciate your blogging work and do try to take the time to read your essays when I get a chance. I also think that one essay a week is reasonable because it's not an overwhelming amount of information to have to take in. Some creators are extremely overproductive by their very nature and create several hours' worth of content every single week (AA is a textbook example, but I believe he was a university lecturer after all, so probably misses the experience of "talking to an audience"). Quality over quantity should be the general rule.

It barely needs to be said that we are absolutely saturated in content in 2026. Every week on the Internet there are thousands of hours' worth of blogs, podcasts, videos and more created. No one, even if they devoted all of their time to watching all of it (which would be a pretty sad existence), could possibly take in even a fraction of what is being said. Online writers, bloggers, vloggers, podcasters and so on must compete for the limited attention of their audience.

There is also the newer factor of AI to take into account: AI can produce in a matter of seconds what could take hours or days for a human to write, with significant mental effort required in the process. Of course, not everything created by AI is of good quality, but we're still in the very early days of AI and the more time that passes, the harder it will become to distinguish between an essay painstakingly written by a human and one written by an AI in under a minute.

All of this should act as an impediment to any aspiring online writer or blogger, but I can think of at least two other factors that can serve to discourage potential bloggers such as yourself:

As you will of course be aware, political speech comes with consequences, especially in this country. It can fall foul of the law in some circumstances, but even if it doesn't do that, there can still be social and economic consequences of political speech. Some employers would happily let go of someone who expresses the "wrong" political opinions online. There are also groups that go around doxxing and spreading personal information about people, sometimes with spurious allegations attached. All of this serves to help "shut people up" and has the effect of helping to perpetuate the injustices that continue to prevail in our societies, because it makes it harder to speak the truth plainly, openly and without the kind of self-censorship that so many people engage in.

Finally, there's also the simple reality of people not having enough free time to write, especially for those who work full-time. If I did not have to work, I'd probably be capable of writing similar weekly blog posts to those you're publishing at the moment, as I'm certainly not short of ideas or things to say. When your free time is limited, though, all of that goes out the window.

The biggest problem with writing is that the effort-reward ratio isn't balanced for most people: if blogging were a highly lucrative industry, I'd be right in there and would happily quit my current job to do something similar to what you're doing, but the reality for most is that it's a struggle, and extremely competitive due to the aforementioned over-saturation of content and the "attention economy" we have in the social media age.

Unfortunately, this means that genuinely great and intellectually nuanced ideas are sometimes lost simply because there isn't a market for them, and many people have their attention captured by the most simplistic of things. One of the biggest problems with the free market is that it doesn't genuinely reward true greatness; instead true greatness sometimes languishes in obscurity while that which appeals to the lowest common denominator is the most commercially successful. There are countless examples within music, food, TV, entertainment, and elsewhere: slop for the masses makes a profit while those occupying a creative niche struggle financially.

A society like ours that doesn't seem to value the truth, beauty, greatness or intellectual nuance, and above all, just wants you to shut up, pay taxes and die, is a psychologically demoralising environment. That is why it is so important that people like you are doing the work you do: you speak for thousands of others who have a very similar perspective on many issues. Keep up the great work.

James Solbakken's avatar

So, there's a madness to your method, that explains a lot. You forgot to advise that we eschew obfuscation. But seriously, I feel like writing something now. Thanks for the inspiration.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?