An Open Letter to the British Establishment

Stephen Ogilvie is, and always was, what luckier people sometimes call “a poor soul”. Not bright, not talented, not impressive, not fortunate… but good. Unable to make much of a mark on the world, he wanted to at least do what he could: he helped the people around him.

Last week in Belfast, he helped two African men. Hadi Alodid and Younis Arabi were moving into the flat downstairs. He did “everything he could” for them. After a few days the Africans’ relationship with this local man who was trying to help them went downhill. One of them attacked, disfigured and maimed him. Maybe he had looked at them the wrong way.

Well, now he will never look at anyone again. Alodid gouged his eyes, blinding him forever. He also slashed his face and his neck, many times. Once “recovered”, Ogilvie will look like something from a horror film. If he is lucky, he will not understand how dire his situation is. But he will be traumatised and will probably spend the rest of his life in a state of vague terror that what happened to him could, now that he is much more vulnerable, happen to him again at any moment. The small amount of independence he had has been taken away. He will be helpless.

The ruination of this poor man’s life is entirely on you, the British establishment, comprising the government, civil service and mainstream media.

---

Civilisation requires that the low respects the high and the high protects the low. That is the bargain. This dynamic produces a functional, sustainable culture that handles truth with integrity and uses resources sensibly.

The price of status is that the high have a moral duty towards the low. Rich people look after the poor. Intelligent people organise the unintelligent. Educated people steward the ignorant. Able and well-connected people solve problems for the helpless. Above all, the establishment - ostensibly comprising the most intelligent, educated, able and well-connected people around - look after everything that is beyond ordinary people to look after, from the borders to the emergency services and the welfare state.

People like you - intelligent, connected, aware - have a moral duty to protect people like Stephen Ogilvie - simple, vulnerable, naive. You failed in that duty. He is the latest in a very long line of your failures. You failed to protect countless thousands of young English girls from being preyed upon by foreign men (yes, foreign men, because they are not British and never will be). You failed to protect Henry Nowak. You failed to protect Charlene Downes. You failed to protect Kriss Donald. You failed to protect this girl in Dundee. You failed to protect a million and more White Britons who, unfortunately for them, needed you to protect them.

They needed you to protect them, first and foremost, by not injecting into their communities people who are much more likely to commit violent crime.

People from the Third World are much more likely to commit violent crime.

Your predecessors knew this (it’s common sense) but let them into Britain anyway. Once they proved the stereotypes accurate, your predecessors let more of them in. This happened a hundred times since 1948, culminating with Boris Johnson’s extraordinary treachery (treason) in admitting over two million such people in 2021-23. In this crime against the British people he was aided by Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman, two traitors who now hope to bedazzle the British people once again under the guise of Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage who proves his treachery by not ejecting them both immediately.

Farage declares that race doesn’t matter, anyone can become British, we mustn’t alienate Muslims, and it’s fine if we get replaced to extinction in our own homeland. Farage is already in your club, but he hopes to rise within it and knows he must therefore say these things. This is what you require of politicians: acquiescence, treachery, deceit.

Your requirements of the general public are equally outrageous. You do not merely demand that we accept Third Worlders. You do not merely demand that we tolerate them. You actually demand that we celebrate them. If delusion is impossible for us, you demand that we pretend to celebrate them. The least you will accept from us is silence. If we complain, you punish us.

To be clear… Your crime is not merely that you refuse to solve a problem. It is that you have caused and are maintaining and continually worsening the problem.

Some have likened it to “the emperor’s new clothes”, but it is worse than that, because the emperor’s nakedness did not bring barbarism and misery upon his citizens. Your fantasy does. You demand that we believe in and love something that is destroying us.

Anyone would think that you viscerally hate us and want us extinct. (Your bosses in global finance certainly do. Maybe you just want promotion.)

Usually you don’t punish us directly. The government and judiciary are only two of the weapons you use to oppress us. You have a whole infrastructure in place to punish us indirectly - the media, NGOs, antifa, Hope Not Hate, all backed up by corrupt, fraudulent academics. Destruction of reputation and livelihood are your favoured techniques, because they maintain your “plausible deniability”.

But you are also perfectly willing to use law. Indeed you make sure to use it disproportionately against us, giving more harsh sentences than to foreigners who commit the same crimes. This is your two-tier anarcho-tyranny.

It works well in the short term. In the long term, it destroys your legitimacy.

You arrest us, seize our devices (and needlessly retain them for years), keep us in legal limbo, imprison us for ridiculous so-called “crimes”… and when one of your Third World pets brutalises one of us, you pressure the victim’s family into issuing blatantly fake statements…

Know this: everything you do is being seen, logged and judged, and eventually you will be held accountable.

Likewise, every Third Worlder who commits some terrible crime against us, is a mark against you who let them in - and eventually you will be held accountable.

Of course, you are thinking “listen to this fool, thinking we have power over every little incident that goes on in the country!” but you do. You have the power at the border, where you choose to accept people you must know are highly likely to be violent, impulsive, low IQ savages. Hadi Alodid is just one of millions of examples.

He came from Sudan, where the average IQ is 79. He travelled to Paris then, in February 2023, flew to Dublin. He entered the United Kingdom by bussing across the border into Northern Ireland. Arriving in Belfast, he immediately claimed asylum. You (specifically Rishi Sunak, Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman) soon introduced a fast-track scheme to clear the asylum backlog.

This scheme - which you opened to Sudanese, Eritreans, Syrians, Afghans, Libyans and Yemenis - meant that Alodid merely had to fill out a 10-page questionnaire. He did this (no doubt with the help of a translator you provided at our expense, since he still needs one three years later) and you rewarded him with a visa allowing him to stay here until 2028. What you expected him to do here in those five years is mysterious; Sudanese (just like Eritreans, Syrians, Afghans, Libyans and Yemenis) are not known for improving European countries. Why did you think they should be fast-tracked into our lives, rather than immediately deported?

Then Alodid spent three years in Belfast. According to police:

There is no trace of this suspect on any of our national security databases and he was not known to the Police Service of Northern Ireland.

So, three years in which he didn’t attempt to brutally murder anyone… until suddenly one day he did.

You might point to those three law-abiding years and claim they make Alodid’s case somewhat ambiguous, not clear cut. But, if you had asked the British public in February 2023 whether you should admit a man from Sudan, they would have told you “no”, emphatically. But you know that. You knew it then. You also knew that they would vehemently oppose placing a Sudanese man anywhere near a vulnerable man like Stephen Ogilvie.

When they voiced this sort of opinion, you ignored them, mocked them, demonised them, fined them, and in many cases imprisoned them. Then you went ahead and placed men like Alodid next to men like Ogilvie, and now a man has been maimed for life - a man who it is your job to protect, more than it is your job to accommodate the foreigner who maimed him.

“Ah,” you say, “but most men like Alodid don’t do things like this!” Indeed. They just ruin our towns, dilute our culture, lower our social trust, intimidate our girls, and either live off us on welfare or do jobs that our own people would otherwise be doing. So we don’t want them either. But we told you that already. We’ve been telling you for sixty years and more.

You laugh about “gammon” and “Muslamic rayguns”, pour scorn on the poor and uneducated while pretending to value them. You claim virtue while making life difficult for your own people. Then, when they cannot escape the consequences of what you have done, you mock, criticise and lecture them. This is not how a society is supposed to operate.

Look again at Stephen Ogilvie, the man you should have protected.

Even before being brutalised, he wasn’t pretty. He isn’t graceful or sophisticated. He doesn’t understand much. He doesn’t listen to Debussy. He doesn’t attend plays in the West End. He hasn’t read Jane Austen. He is unfamiliar with exotic cultures and knows only the most basic form of his own.

You loathe him. After all, he will never lead anything or create anything; his achievements will be unremarkable. What kind of avatar is he of a civilisation? He is not even the “salt of the earth” working-class who keep things going. He represents the most unfortunate of our people.

But he is ours. He is yours. And he was your responsibility.

All you had to do was not make his life worse than it already was. All you had to do was not place men like Hadi Alodid near to him.

But, like a child holding a boiling kettle over insects, you wondered how “the gammon” would react to the Third World. You already knew, of course, from decades of experience, but you had to find out just one more time.

Stephen Ogilvie is paying the price for your sadism. He will pay it for the rest of his life.

---

I believe that these decisions will soon be taken from you. You are going to be removed from power.

Right now you are feigning outrage at the rioting in Southampton and Belfast, but I don’t think you will ultimately be defenestrated through violence. I think it will happen quite calmly. A tap on the shoulder, a routine memo, a knock on your office door. But it will be decisive. Your whimpering will be futile.

What you should really be worried about is not the manner of your removal, but the punishment you will be handed afterwards by a court of (reformed) law. Treason is taken seriously. Of course, your treason is not against the state but against the native people of your country. That there is (astonishingly) no law for that will be your only hope for mitigation.

I realise that some of you will slip through the net. A few will even, in the manner of a snake, miraculously pop up in the new regime, proclaiming that you have always believed in all of the new ideas, voicing them more energetically than anyone else, and even judging people for not being sufficiently ethnocentric. It’s nauseating but, well, that’s just you.

Most of you, though, will never hold power again.

I expect that for some of you this will be a relief. Cowardly and conformist, you know you are part of a rotten regime and you don’t feel great about it. You push the doubts aside every night when you close your eyes, and every morning when you close them again.

But for others among you, the idea of this all being over will be terrifying. You were willing to proclaim anything in order to get ahead. You didn’t care whether it was true or not, and when reality proved it false, you denied reality, and vilified us for pointing at reality. Nothing was more important to you than your personal career success, even at the expense of your ethnic group.

It seems unlikely to me that, in all of human history, there have ever been people more treacherous than you in charge of a city, a country, a former empire. Perhaps there have, but history is too disgusted to remember them.

We will make sure that you are remembered.