I have said before that our age is replete with dishonesty. A tissue of lies enforces the fashionable ideas, protects the status quo and sustains the momentum for implementing insanity. It is perhaps worth examining just one instance of this deceit.
This utter inversion of reality would never be allowed to happen, not in a million years. First of all, the Muslim community would not let it happen, they would mobilise as one homogenous block across the country, there would be protests with the Muslim protesters numbers bolstered by the left. The Guardian, who don't want to talk about crimes committed by non whites, would never let it drop. Shows like The Jeremy Vine show would have it as their only topic, with the likes of Owen Jones and Yasmin Alibi Brown telling us how white people are evil. The reality is, this would never happen, white people simply do not behave like this, they really don't. What about Jimmy Saville? What about white paedophile's? Yes, there are white sexual offenders, but they operate in the shadows, Gary Glitters activities only came to light when he took his pc in for repair. The Pakistani offenders operated in plain sight and all the time, those charged with their protection, the police and social workers looked the other way. Labour politicians, who rely and continue to rely on the Muslim block vote also looked the other way. Social workers who raised concerns were sent on diversity courses, and any Labour MP who attempted to shine a light on these crimes would be told that it wasn't in their best interests to do so.
Nice post, but I'm afraid there's no "self-hatred" or "traitorousness to one's own" or "lack of understanding" in the mediocrats who make and watch this sort of propaganda drivel, regardless of their racial purity level. Not only are they the smuggest and least self-hating people on earth, they are also part of the ruling class and know perfectly well who their allies and enemies are. White nationalism does not provide a very helpful theoretical framework for understanding their role.
Thank you for your analysis of this Islamiphilic and anti white propagandist mind rot. Personally I no longer have any interest in entertainment and much of the arts, with the exception of the classics, due to the infestation and subversion at all levels by such inculcated and indoctrinated "useful idiots" and bad faith actors. Why would I waste my precious and limited time, resources and Intellect on such obvious falsehoods and gaslighting? I've come to the oponion that if after all that's happened over the past 10 years or so, as a grown adult you haven't woken up and smelled the stench of "rotten state of Denmark" then in all likelihood you never will. Not because you can't, but because you won't, you don't want to. Mark Twain commented over a century and a half ago along the lines of the convenient lie, is always more readily accepted, than the inconvenient and unpalatable truth. He was right then, even more so now. I've ceased to engage with most "normies", though I do on occasions challenge activists and ideologs. A lie should never go unchallenged in my opinion, the same for liars, etc. If and when such people ask me questions or my opinion about various subjects, for the most part it's simply a joke, a means of having a laugh at the conspiracy theorist nutter, and getting others to do the same. It doesn't work that well with me, as the opinions of stupid people and fools hold no weight with me. If someone engages with me and it's not an honest conversation then I don't bother, other than the polite banal exchange of inconsequential irrelevancies. Occasionally, someone does genuinely ask me my opinion on something then I'll engage with those people in an open, honest exchange of information and ideas. It's all to easy to bombard the genuinely curious and neophyte truth seekers by bombarding them with too much information and truth. So I often have to filter my conversations to make them more easily understood and palatable, so as not to overwhelm and deter them. I seek to encourage people to make their own enquiries and come to their own conclusions in forming their opinions and not simply regurgitating parrot fashion the opinions of others, especially the mainstream authorised and accepted narrative.
This reminds me of the 'Mattress Girl' affair from about ten years ago when wokism was first on the rise seriously. This girl who falsely claimed that a fellow student had raped her went around college with a mattress strapped to her back saying it was a symbol of what had been done to her.
When it finally got to some kind of college investigation they found there was no evidence of rape but instead she had been sending him emails and texts of a sexual nature indicating she wanted to have sex with him.
I went to an open seminar at Leeds Gender Studies in which this case was mentioned as if it was true. When I pointed out that it had been proven false the speaker said 'But this is the sort of thing that happens so it is a good example'. Which is rather like Clapper or Brennan saying that the Russiagate allegations 'rang true' despite being false. To reference an old meme 'In their minds it was true'.
The lack of introspection and intelligence displayed by these cretinous agitators is staggering and they expect us to swallow this production of lies. They are utterly repellent. I fail to comprehend the mind set needed to produce something like this and for other protagonists to support and endorse it. They have endless hate for us and we don’t hate these people enough.
~~In exactly the way of the bumbling conservative who naively helps his enemy weaken him and conquer him, Evans says that, dishonest though Hussain might be about English society, her perspective on it “deserves attention”. To be clear: when someone is trying to undermine your society and vilify your people, you should respect her perspective and give it your attention.~~
At a glance, he could mean it in another way. The same way a doctor might say "this cancer deserves your attention" or such and such numbers "deserve your attention."
I mean if someone is a saboteur trying to undermine society - actually yes I think they should be given attention because ignoring it would not be combatting it. That doesn't necessarily entail respecting the person either.
Now would I bet on the person you quote as meaning the phrase in that way? Not really. But it could still be a misunderstanding.
~~ He takes seriously the possibility that “the media, police and justice system” are conspiring to victimise Muslims. In doing so Evans condemns himself as a fool, a useful idiot, and a traitor to his people.~~
Like here, I have trouble agreeing with your reading because the person you quoted outright says: "some muslims believe..." before the possibility you claim the author takes seriously. Even follows up with "according to the playwright."
~~People will look back at this age as we look back at human sacrifice in Mesoamerica.~~
Funny you use that example when this was posted 3 days ago:
I've written two comic plays, both reflecting my politics. I don't even think "how could this be staged?" as there's no way either would be acceptable to modern theatre folk, actually the gobsmacked horror the first provoked in a mildly leftie academic friend pleased me no end. I think I used the dreaded N word fifty times in the first scene, strictly for artistic reasons you understand.
'Expendable' is probably a mix of taqiyyah (it's fine to lie in defence of Islam) and just typical middle class obliviousness. After Brexit an effete upper middle class colleague told me, in all seriousness, that there were now waves of racist violence exploding across the Yoo-kay (this was the regime narrative for a while); then when I told him I'd voted for Brexit he immediately stated, "and now you regret it." He was only truly flustered when I said, "Not at all. My entire family voted for it and we would all do so again." Again, the Regretful Brexiteer was the regime narrative for a while. Guardian articles are all these fools "know" of the world outside their middle class bubble.
'Expendable' seems to be in fighting retreat: it concedes that Muslim/Pakistani rapes are "a thing", that even a supposedly Westernised Muslim family are just 1 degree of separation from a Pakistani rapist of note; it imagines that the native British population are sufficiently aware of the situation that violent anti-immigrant mobs & vigilante groups are somehow the norm; it ludicrously fabulates that the regime is on the side of the native British. Even while this is mostly just stupid lies, a core of truth remains: the Pakistani rape gangs are real, and the native British are not happy.
Contact WAC. The White Art Collective they create pro White articles, art, plays, music etc so it might be worth a conversation if you want to get your plays published? Good luck
Happy to be corrected, but I'm certain that the press don't 'expose a suspect' unless they have been charged with a crime. The reason why the photos we see are usually mugshots. A paper could get a name wrong but I doubt they would put in some other guy's photo.
A more general thought, maybe this isn't chutzpah from Hussain and is how she actually thinks. That they do fear that the majority in society will turn against them and their group, however paranoid that seems to us. No matter how much academia or the police bend over backwards for these people, they still don't trust them.
Don't worry, my idea that we lived in a rational society was well and truly shattered by the events of 2020.
One of those searing articles whose passionate articulation of the truth is acutely painful to read - so distressing is its subject matter. Permit me to say, then, MW, that you’ve done us all a great service in analysing it so frankly and fearlessly. What can one say? It is so profoundly morally abysmal it leaves one speechless. -Almost.
Back in the day, I used to submit the odd play to the RC and was invited to attend their “writers workshop” (a stupid communist [Brechtian] phrase that has tragically entered modern literary consciousness). The experience was so disillusioning (in my early 30s), with drama addressed from a ruthlessly utilitarian “Marxian perspective, that it became obvious to me I had no future in theatre. As we have seen: All other theatres would subsequently go the same way, so that the average theatre goer was left with a stark choice between endless trashy musicals, or mediocre revivals bastardised by insultingly diverse casts, or straight leftist agit-prop drama.
The takeover (ie., abject surrender) of theatre in this country, which began in the late 50s, with Ken Tynan’s ‘angry young men’ cadre, is now horrifyingly complete, resulting in this obscene Muslim play inverting reality at the RC.
In reality I believe there are stages to Civil War: the so-called ‘culture wars’ are just the first phase in which the battle of ideas is fought out . But inevitably that intellectual battle finds embodiment in the form of an ensuing actual physical battle fought on behalf of those ideas - just as it was throughout Europe in the wars and revolutions from 1917 onwards.
People moot the possibility of it, but the blunt fact is that we are all already at war, we just don’t know it yet. But when the time does come, when Balkanisation does occur in Europe, as it will and must, it is writing such as yours that will prove to be the rallying point of our cause. There’s a heroism in that.
I have always wondered why no worthy musicals have been created in the West End since 2000. They import from Broadway or re-stage old ones. In parallel few new plays are good and almost all are oriented whether heavily or lightly. Thank you for the explanation.
There is literally no discourse permitted in theatre outside the leftist worldview. The movies are, of course, the same. The takeover is complete. No coincidence that the work produced is unawatchable.
Good article. The play sounds beyond parody. Academia being “far right”? Absurd.
Also, are all Muslim apostates who drink alcohol named after their chosen tipple? If there’s one called Stella, there must be Carlings, Malibus, & Double-Bells-and-Cokes…?
They will not look back. White people are being erased from history, or painted as uniquely evil. In the future, when England is 10% indigenous, those people, the few who learn about the play, will believe it was completely true.
On the conservative point, Roger Scruton wrote a book about the Rape Gangs called "The Disappeared" (2015) before he died that's received very little attention. Despite the horror it portrays in what I would a consider a totally inappropriate second-person rape scene, it commits itself to a kind of artistic neutrality that makes a strong, partisan conclusion impossible to reach. The book fails because it fails to condemn evil absolutely, and as evil. I think this cuts to the heart of what motivates conservatives to make their central obligation proving by any means necessary that they aren't racist. It's not just that they follow a post-Christianity coloured by the 1960s, but that they have a sick desire to see both sides of the argument always. The middle class also love their relativism. The literature of reaction must be moral -like Heinrich von Kleist plays.
This utter inversion of reality would never be allowed to happen, not in a million years. First of all, the Muslim community would not let it happen, they would mobilise as one homogenous block across the country, there would be protests with the Muslim protesters numbers bolstered by the left. The Guardian, who don't want to talk about crimes committed by non whites, would never let it drop. Shows like The Jeremy Vine show would have it as their only topic, with the likes of Owen Jones and Yasmin Alibi Brown telling us how white people are evil. The reality is, this would never happen, white people simply do not behave like this, they really don't. What about Jimmy Saville? What about white paedophile's? Yes, there are white sexual offenders, but they operate in the shadows, Gary Glitters activities only came to light when he took his pc in for repair. The Pakistani offenders operated in plain sight and all the time, those charged with their protection, the police and social workers looked the other way. Labour politicians, who rely and continue to rely on the Muslim block vote also looked the other way. Social workers who raised concerns were sent on diversity courses, and any Labour MP who attempted to shine a light on these crimes would be told that it wasn't in their best interests to do so.
Nice post, but I'm afraid there's no "self-hatred" or "traitorousness to one's own" or "lack of understanding" in the mediocrats who make and watch this sort of propaganda drivel, regardless of their racial purity level. Not only are they the smuggest and least self-hating people on earth, they are also part of the ruling class and know perfectly well who their allies and enemies are. White nationalism does not provide a very helpful theoretical framework for understanding their role.
Thank you for your analysis of this Islamiphilic and anti white propagandist mind rot. Personally I no longer have any interest in entertainment and much of the arts, with the exception of the classics, due to the infestation and subversion at all levels by such inculcated and indoctrinated "useful idiots" and bad faith actors. Why would I waste my precious and limited time, resources and Intellect on such obvious falsehoods and gaslighting? I've come to the oponion that if after all that's happened over the past 10 years or so, as a grown adult you haven't woken up and smelled the stench of "rotten state of Denmark" then in all likelihood you never will. Not because you can't, but because you won't, you don't want to. Mark Twain commented over a century and a half ago along the lines of the convenient lie, is always more readily accepted, than the inconvenient and unpalatable truth. He was right then, even more so now. I've ceased to engage with most "normies", though I do on occasions challenge activists and ideologs. A lie should never go unchallenged in my opinion, the same for liars, etc. If and when such people ask me questions or my opinion about various subjects, for the most part it's simply a joke, a means of having a laugh at the conspiracy theorist nutter, and getting others to do the same. It doesn't work that well with me, as the opinions of stupid people and fools hold no weight with me. If someone engages with me and it's not an honest conversation then I don't bother, other than the polite banal exchange of inconsequential irrelevancies. Occasionally, someone does genuinely ask me my opinion on something then I'll engage with those people in an open, honest exchange of information and ideas. It's all to easy to bombard the genuinely curious and neophyte truth seekers by bombarding them with too much information and truth. So I often have to filter my conversations to make them more easily understood and palatable, so as not to overwhelm and deter them. I seek to encourage people to make their own enquiries and come to their own conclusions in forming their opinions and not simply regurgitating parrot fashion the opinions of others, especially the mainstream authorised and accepted narrative.
This reminds me of the 'Mattress Girl' affair from about ten years ago when wokism was first on the rise seriously. This girl who falsely claimed that a fellow student had raped her went around college with a mattress strapped to her back saying it was a symbol of what had been done to her.
When it finally got to some kind of college investigation they found there was no evidence of rape but instead she had been sending him emails and texts of a sexual nature indicating she wanted to have sex with him.
I went to an open seminar at Leeds Gender Studies in which this case was mentioned as if it was true. When I pointed out that it had been proven false the speaker said 'But this is the sort of thing that happens so it is a good example'. Which is rather like Clapper or Brennan saying that the Russiagate allegations 'rang true' despite being false. To reference an old meme 'In their minds it was true'.
The lack of introspection and intelligence displayed by these cretinous agitators is staggering and they expect us to swallow this production of lies. They are utterly repellent. I fail to comprehend the mind set needed to produce something like this and for other protagonists to support and endorse it. They have endless hate for us and we don’t hate these people enough.
~~In exactly the way of the bumbling conservative who naively helps his enemy weaken him and conquer him, Evans says that, dishonest though Hussain might be about English society, her perspective on it “deserves attention”. To be clear: when someone is trying to undermine your society and vilify your people, you should respect her perspective and give it your attention.~~
At a glance, he could mean it in another way. The same way a doctor might say "this cancer deserves your attention" or such and such numbers "deserve your attention."
I mean if someone is a saboteur trying to undermine society - actually yes I think they should be given attention because ignoring it would not be combatting it. That doesn't necessarily entail respecting the person either.
Now would I bet on the person you quote as meaning the phrase in that way? Not really. But it could still be a misunderstanding.
~~ He takes seriously the possibility that “the media, police and justice system” are conspiring to victimise Muslims. In doing so Evans condemns himself as a fool, a useful idiot, and a traitor to his people.~~
Like here, I have trouble agreeing with your reading because the person you quoted outright says: "some muslims believe..." before the possibility you claim the author takes seriously. Even follows up with "according to the playwright."
~~People will look back at this age as we look back at human sacrifice in Mesoamerica.~~
Funny you use that example when this was posted 3 days ago:
https://youtu.be/-bd_AUSkrRA?si=YcKbjR9BPH9ATxic
You might be right, but my instinct is telling me the guy is a complete cuck.
Like I said, there's a good chance you're right, and I'm not going to bet against you.
I've often wonder how you could ever tell sarcasm/satire in writing. Like as a rule.
But I have noticed things starting to spread to the normie sector too.
I've written two comic plays, both reflecting my politics. I don't even think "how could this be staged?" as there's no way either would be acceptable to modern theatre folk, actually the gobsmacked horror the first provoked in a mildly leftie academic friend pleased me no end. I think I used the dreaded N word fifty times in the first scene, strictly for artistic reasons you understand.
'Expendable' is probably a mix of taqiyyah (it's fine to lie in defence of Islam) and just typical middle class obliviousness. After Brexit an effete upper middle class colleague told me, in all seriousness, that there were now waves of racist violence exploding across the Yoo-kay (this was the regime narrative for a while); then when I told him I'd voted for Brexit he immediately stated, "and now you regret it." He was only truly flustered when I said, "Not at all. My entire family voted for it and we would all do so again." Again, the Regretful Brexiteer was the regime narrative for a while. Guardian articles are all these fools "know" of the world outside their middle class bubble.
'Expendable' seems to be in fighting retreat: it concedes that Muslim/Pakistani rapes are "a thing", that even a supposedly Westernised Muslim family are just 1 degree of separation from a Pakistani rapist of note; it imagines that the native British population are sufficiently aware of the situation that violent anti-immigrant mobs & vigilante groups are somehow the norm; it ludicrously fabulates that the regime is on the side of the native British. Even while this is mostly just stupid lies, a core of truth remains: the Pakistani rape gangs are real, and the native British are not happy.
Contact WAC. The White Art Collective they create pro White articles, art, plays, music etc so it might be worth a conversation if you want to get your plays published? Good luck
Thanks for the tip!
Happy to be corrected, but I'm certain that the press don't 'expose a suspect' unless they have been charged with a crime. The reason why the photos we see are usually mugshots. A paper could get a name wrong but I doubt they would put in some other guy's photo.
A more general thought, maybe this isn't chutzpah from Hussain and is how she actually thinks. That they do fear that the majority in society will turn against them and their group, however paranoid that seems to us. No matter how much academia or the police bend over backwards for these people, they still don't trust them.
Don't worry, my idea that we lived in a rational society was well and truly shattered by the events of 2020.
When it comes to the complete failure to engage with reality, educated white middle class leftists are the undisputed champions.
One of those searing articles whose passionate articulation of the truth is acutely painful to read - so distressing is its subject matter. Permit me to say, then, MW, that you’ve done us all a great service in analysing it so frankly and fearlessly. What can one say? It is so profoundly morally abysmal it leaves one speechless. -Almost.
Back in the day, I used to submit the odd play to the RC and was invited to attend their “writers workshop” (a stupid communist [Brechtian] phrase that has tragically entered modern literary consciousness). The experience was so disillusioning (in my early 30s), with drama addressed from a ruthlessly utilitarian “Marxian perspective, that it became obvious to me I had no future in theatre. As we have seen: All other theatres would subsequently go the same way, so that the average theatre goer was left with a stark choice between endless trashy musicals, or mediocre revivals bastardised by insultingly diverse casts, or straight leftist agit-prop drama.
The takeover (ie., abject surrender) of theatre in this country, which began in the late 50s, with Ken Tynan’s ‘angry young men’ cadre, is now horrifyingly complete, resulting in this obscene Muslim play inverting reality at the RC.
In reality I believe there are stages to Civil War: the so-called ‘culture wars’ are just the first phase in which the battle of ideas is fought out . But inevitably that intellectual battle finds embodiment in the form of an ensuing actual physical battle fought on behalf of those ideas - just as it was throughout Europe in the wars and revolutions from 1917 onwards.
People moot the possibility of it, but the blunt fact is that we are all already at war, we just don’t know it yet. But when the time does come, when Balkanisation does occur in Europe, as it will and must, it is writing such as yours that will prove to be the rallying point of our cause. There’s a heroism in that.
I have always wondered why no worthy musicals have been created in the West End since 2000. They import from Broadway or re-stage old ones. In parallel few new plays are good and almost all are oriented whether heavily or lightly. Thank you for the explanation.
There is literally no discourse permitted in theatre outside the leftist worldview. The movies are, of course, the same. The takeover is complete. No coincidence that the work produced is unawatchable.
Thank you, James.
Good article. The play sounds beyond parody. Academia being “far right”? Absurd.
Also, are all Muslim apostates who drink alcohol named after their chosen tipple? If there’s one called Stella, there must be Carlings, Malibus, & Double-Bells-and-Cokes…?
Media is also far-right. All the middle class has watched Alan Partridge and knows of his reach.
They will not look back. White people are being erased from history, or painted as uniquely evil. In the future, when England is 10% indigenous, those people, the few who learn about the play, will believe it was completely true.
I hope not...
On the conservative point, Roger Scruton wrote a book about the Rape Gangs called "The Disappeared" (2015) before he died that's received very little attention. Despite the horror it portrays in what I would a consider a totally inappropriate second-person rape scene, it commits itself to a kind of artistic neutrality that makes a strong, partisan conclusion impossible to reach. The book fails because it fails to condemn evil absolutely, and as evil. I think this cuts to the heart of what motivates conservatives to make their central obligation proving by any means necessary that they aren't racist. It's not just that they follow a post-Christianity coloured by the 1960s, but that they have a sick desire to see both sides of the argument always. The middle class also love their relativism. The literature of reaction must be moral -like Heinrich von Kleist plays.