Very well said and I'm in agreement with virtually all of what you've written here (catching up on old Woes articles at the moment, so leaving my thoughts now)
To summarise, the way I see it:
Only sensible, respectable, intelligent and smart looking people to represent RB as political candidates (Charlie Downes sets the standard here)
No one with any "skeletons in the closet" or "unnecessary baggage" to represent RB in public-facing roles
Those representing RB to "keep their noses clean" in terms of both online and offline behaviour
Watch out for bad actors and infiltrators; be prepared to remove them ruthlessly and with extreme prejudice
Watch out for the media and activists who might be looking to catch RB candidates out in order to smear the party
Do not dilute or moderate RB's policies in order to appease Leftists, Boomers or Centrists: another Reform UK is not required
The policies outlined in the governance section are a bit far fetched to say the least.
You would firstly need a super majority to even be able to rationally propose them. Secondly you would essentially be declaring war on the global establishment; made up of the EU, the UN, global banks and business.
I simply do not see how Lowe does not get swiftly ousted considering these challenges. BlackRock is very serious about DEI, so most businesses are by extension— many will threaten to withdraw from the UK in varying capacities.
Make 10X more enemies than Liz Truss did and the pressure will very quickly become insurmountable, even moreso considering the low likelihood of a restore super majority.
A scintillating manifesto for the hour - and for the heroes that will be needed! - Lowe should 'read, study and inwardly digest' this piece if he wants RB to succeed. The tragedy is that Lowe will feel he can't afford to consult you - or be seen to consult you- because of your reputation (for the unpalatable truth). But who knows: a few more invasions and even the most bovine normie may begin to open his/her eyes to Israel's wickedness. We can but hope.
In 1987, The “white” world was bifurcated between two countries of similar ethnic and racial diversity;the United States/America and the Soviet Union/Russia. The percentage of the population that was white was similar (75-80%), and both had ethnic/group cores. The USSR had a Russian/Slavic/East European core, while the USA had a Northwestern European/Nordic core (if you don't believe me look into US immigration policy and eugenics 1924-1965). But after 1990, everything changed. The USSR collapsed, Russia losing its near abroad but also losing most of its nonwhite/Muslim population, a Great Replacement-esque fear being a major thing in the 1980s. Meanwhile, the USA had the 1990 Immigration Act, far more important than the overhyped 1965 Act and an exploding nonwhite population that hadn't been "dealt" with in the same way as Russia. Fast forward to 2010, things couldn't be more extreme. The USA is only 64% non-Hispanic white, and is the only white country with a brown leader. Canada New Zealand Australia are far whiter than it at this point. Western Europe, which had a somewhat similar but less significant guest worker+ex-colonial immigration from 1945-1990, integrated with very white Eastern European countries in the EU, recieving migration from there rather than nonwhite countries like the USA. Another odd thing about this whole predicament is that it isn't Southern Europeans who hate America, (they are brown-skinned and more racially akin to North Africans Turks and Levantines) but the white whites of Northwestern Europe and Eastern Europe. Forgetting that the USA has a Nordic core and posthoc recharacterizing America according to its current state, they believe were heavily mixed with nonwhites and South Europeans, developing a burning hatred and aloof disrespect in the process. The sheer quasi-racial anti-American cruelty is unimaginable and makes me cry. But there will be a swift and deft punishment. Fast forward to 2026. The Anglo world is racially fucked (which I support!) Canada was 67% White in 2021, but its population has grown by more than 4 million, leaving it hovering somewhere around the 60% mark. Australia 72% in 2021, has grown by more than 2 million, leaving it likely in the 65-69% range. according to the 2023 NZ census, only 55.9% of NZ's population is of wholly European descent. meanwhile, while the UK and Ireland are still fairly white, the PM of Ireland and Mayor of Dublin have been nonwhite, and the FM of Scotland, FM of Wales, Mayor of London, and PM of UK have been nonwhite coterminiously. so they are fully "cucked" in that way. meanwhile, the Northwestern European and Eastern European parts of the EU remain far too white for the global elites (who i support) and Russia too white as well. both around 85-90%. The global elites are orchestrating a nuclear war in Europe right now that will "fix" the demographic problem. Conventional war is just not deadly enough. It will be short brutal and epic. 10,000,000+ Northwestern Europeans and Eastern Europeans will be killed. I am extremely ill right now so this is the best explanation I can give. But is it really a coincidence, the entire formerly Nordic English-speaking world racially "matching" at the same time? I think not. Enjoy the Russian nukes. I certainly will, vicariously (This will all happen before 2029 BTW, and will begin before April 2027)
An excellent take. I do hope some important people at Restore Britain read it.
You forgot the Bank of England among the institutions that need to be taken control of. They demolished Liz Truss in no time. They could do so to Restore Britain. This might be the first fight should Restore win the elections.
Your analyses are good or excellent. But you have not tackled the pillars of Global Britain :
- the legal profession at 200,000 GBP/year for beginners and hundreds of thousands of professionals
- the financial profession at 100,000 GBP/year for beginners is a hydra composed of banks, asset mangers, hedge funds, private equity, securities exchanges, insurance, crypto companies employing 1+ million persons
- the real estate profession with agents, speculators, constructors, bribes to officials
- the high technology with IT and life sciences with another 100,000 well paid professionals
- the media under the enormous impact of filming and voice recording in international partnerships
- MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and most generals/admirals as allies of the CIA, NSA and the rest of the American spook state
All of them draw hugely from the international opening and free immigration. They currently vote Labour overwhelmingly though the heart of many leans Liberal or Green. They view themselves as the living forces of Britain that have to sacrifice a large part of their earnings to support a vast backward hinterland. They see themselves as the future of the country and the positive impact that their ideas have on the their London-centred environment. They will oppose very actively both Farage and Restore Britain because they fully understand that the retarded many in the hinterland want to destroy their good fortune.
British patriots, or Little England, allied with a faction of Global Britain to win Brexit. But right now British patriots and Global Britain are Schmittian ennemies. If I were to bet, I would bet against patriots and mourn the passing of Anglo Britain. Could you spare some thoughts on these really powerful groups and what Restore Britain could offer them so as to make at least one defect to their side ? Restore Britain cannot win through politicking an electioneering without the support of at least one major pillar. Such a support would also guarantee sufficient funds.
Just returning the country to the state before mass immigration will not remove the natives who want international multiculturalism, of which there are millions, in addition to the major institutions you mentioned. And NGOs like Open Society.
Under restore britain's leadership, such people will form a resistance network, within and without, which will act to undermine, oppose, and subvert the government at every turn.
They will organise mass protests, false flags, worker strikes, sabotage, riots, false documents, underground migrant hotels, it will be a logistical nightmare.
This will force loyalists in the government to search for and arrest traitors, "protesters" and ring leaders, who their opponents will style as political prisoners.
RB will then be painted as fascists like the authoritarian state from V for Vendetta.
And in many ways they would be correct, to maintain any semblance of order they would end up a police state.
In addition, the detention camps for deporting migrants, and later holding subversives, will be called concentration camps, and as we have seen with ICE camps in america, people will die in them.
Providing the resistance with excellent propaganda material.
We would get a country even more polarised than america.
These obstacles are not insurmountable though, there is a surprisingly efficient way to prevent all of it.
Split Britain into Heritage Britain and Commonwealth Britain.
Heritage Britain is a homeland for those with indigenous british ancestry.
Commonwealth Britain will continue the multicultural diversity project.
The two zones will become self-fulfilling prophecies, the media will paint Heritage Britain as backwards racist enclaves, and the Commonwealth areas as progressive and futuristic.
Left wing people who want diversity will move to live in these areas, while indigenous british racists will flock to the racist enclaves.
There will be no need for mass detention facilities since the commonwealth area can be used as a place of exile.
This eliminates a need for concentration camps, clears out subversives naturally, reduces reliance on police state tactics, and provides evidence for the future.
In the future, anyone who begins to think that multiculturalism might be a good idea will have the ability to see it with their own eyes.
If they wish to live in it they can, or they will change their mind.
This addresses the final risk: resurgence.
Decades after success, international networks will continue trying to brainwash people, they will tell exiled future generations that we had a utopia and it was ruined by racists. That all the bad stuff is lies.
We could get a backlash that would reverse all the progress made.
If a commonwealth britain exists, and is clearly a terrible place, their argument makes no sense.
I agree with your perspective as is. But you do not act against Global Britain using the police+crown prosecution service. You hit them at the purse : you can threaten some on-the-surface-well-meaning regulations on each of the pillars that would effectively break their status and destroy a large chunk of their activity and income. Bad for the tax revenue but easy to put in place and quite effective. For all their moralising, these people are very sensitive to status and money. They will hate Restore Britain but remain mostly inactive. You would still need to cull the upper rungs of the judiciary: you can do it in the style of Blair by enacting some neutral-looking reorganisation of the courts.
An example. Say the BBC or ITV produces some propaganda documentary to rouse the upper class against the fascistic undertakings of Restore Britain. A month later the government cuts some tax exemptions and requires fair and transparent remuneration practices which markedly increase to cost of producing video content. Everyone complains but falls in line. One year later the government estimates that this tax-and-regulatory experiment is unsuccessful and brings back the status-quo-ante because they do not want to kill the industry. If the media decides to keep fighting, the government can strangle it for good.
So firstly, I agree that targeting funding sources are a good avenue to apply pressure.
However, I am not convinced that this is enough.
We know that international finance groups, MNCs and NGOs will continue to pour gasoline onto the fire if they can.
One could ban these groups, label them a threat to national security and freeze all transfers from their known accounts.
But in response, they will begin to channel the funds through other charities and ultimately through crime networks.
We also know that intelligence agencies are completely embedded in organised crime, money laundering and trafficking.
They will operate gladio style funding systems for their operatives if need be. Assuming they aren't already.
This may sound far fetched to some, but Islamic groups already operate far less sophisticated schemes to bypass sanctions.
And ultimately what we are dealing with is a sort of secular religion, many are genuinely ideologically committed and will act on its behalf without payment.
E.g. Witch hunts in europe resulted from widespread religious beliefs.
In the soviet union, citizens reported their neighbours to the secret police for little to no gain.
So, my overarching point is that safety is derived from a community of people with similar beliefs and goals who choose to be together and protect one another out of mutual loyalty and trust.
Just as we cannot force rival ethnic groups to play nice, likewise we cannot convince hostile religious groups to ignore their differences either.
The presence of adherents to an anti civilisation religion is a spanner in the works.
It is a policy that reflects what would happen anyway, we just formalise the result and speed up the transition to reduce the current suffering, make the boundaries of the new political regime clear, and develop the strength to resist further corruption.
The new heritage areas would act as a lightning rod drawing supporters from everywhere.
A tactical withdrawal and regroup on the scale of a nation.
Whilst I don't disagree with most of this comment it seems strange to advise avoiding Zionist finance for Restore (essential in my view) when Lowe has publicly stated the UK should support Israel.
One has to consider if a) that was him sticking to the Reform line, b) him not being that knowledgeable on the subject, or c) in fact being a stooge for them. His mention of banning halal and kosher meat production in his announcement video is worth considering in relation to his statement on Israel.
Is John Smith the local pub crawler a true blood Zionist for thinking Israel the nation-state is the good guy vs Hamas terrorists or is he mislead and just going with his very surface level understanding of the world?
Solid post 10/10. As I read I thought, is he going to cover this point? and yes you have. Ok, and is he going to cover that point? yes you have, etc, etc.
And while I'm on a roll Restore needs two to-do lists. One for its manifesto and another in its back pocket to put through using private members' bills.
Something else that occurs to me is not to get sidelined in government by peripheral things like trannies. Matters like trannies enrage normies and are useful tactical points of debate when seeking power. But once in power, Restore needs to focus on actively empowering its core constituents and permanently smashing the other side's foot soldiers.
Retrospectively hanging Pakistani gang rapists and their enablers would be a far more effective immediate political priority than keeping trannies out of ladies changing rooms. It would also be far more culturally transformative in the long term.
Very well said and I'm in agreement with virtually all of what you've written here (catching up on old Woes articles at the moment, so leaving my thoughts now)
To summarise, the way I see it:
Only sensible, respectable, intelligent and smart looking people to represent RB as political candidates (Charlie Downes sets the standard here)
No one with any "skeletons in the closet" or "unnecessary baggage" to represent RB in public-facing roles
Those representing RB to "keep their noses clean" in terms of both online and offline behaviour
Watch out for bad actors and infiltrators; be prepared to remove them ruthlessly and with extreme prejudice
Watch out for the media and activists who might be looking to catch RB candidates out in order to smear the party
Do not dilute or moderate RB's policies in order to appease Leftists, Boomers or Centrists: another Reform UK is not required
I think that just about covers it...
All "hate" laws need abolished, as do all notions of "equality". Whites should be first class citizens by law.
Solid advice. Let's hope they take heed.
The policies outlined in the governance section are a bit far fetched to say the least.
You would firstly need a super majority to even be able to rationally propose them. Secondly you would essentially be declaring war on the global establishment; made up of the EU, the UN, global banks and business.
I simply do not see how Lowe does not get swiftly ousted considering these challenges. BlackRock is very serious about DEI, so most businesses are by extension— many will threaten to withdraw from the UK in varying capacities.
Make 10X more enemies than Liz Truss did and the pressure will very quickly become insurmountable, even moreso considering the low likelihood of a restore super majority.
For this reason I said “this MIGHT involve”.
A scintillating manifesto for the hour - and for the heroes that will be needed! - Lowe should 'read, study and inwardly digest' this piece if he wants RB to succeed. The tragedy is that Lowe will feel he can't afford to consult you - or be seen to consult you- because of your reputation (for the unpalatable truth). But who knows: a few more invasions and even the most bovine normie may begin to open his/her eyes to Israel's wickedness. We can but hope.
Excellent.
I like the positive view of helping rather than riduiculing the generationally jobless who have indeed been neglected.
In 1987, The “white” world was bifurcated between two countries of similar ethnic and racial diversity;the United States/America and the Soviet Union/Russia. The percentage of the population that was white was similar (75-80%), and both had ethnic/group cores. The USSR had a Russian/Slavic/East European core, while the USA had a Northwestern European/Nordic core (if you don't believe me look into US immigration policy and eugenics 1924-1965). But after 1990, everything changed. The USSR collapsed, Russia losing its near abroad but also losing most of its nonwhite/Muslim population, a Great Replacement-esque fear being a major thing in the 1980s. Meanwhile, the USA had the 1990 Immigration Act, far more important than the overhyped 1965 Act and an exploding nonwhite population that hadn't been "dealt" with in the same way as Russia. Fast forward to 2010, things couldn't be more extreme. The USA is only 64% non-Hispanic white, and is the only white country with a brown leader. Canada New Zealand Australia are far whiter than it at this point. Western Europe, which had a somewhat similar but less significant guest worker+ex-colonial immigration from 1945-1990, integrated with very white Eastern European countries in the EU, recieving migration from there rather than nonwhite countries like the USA. Another odd thing about this whole predicament is that it isn't Southern Europeans who hate America, (they are brown-skinned and more racially akin to North Africans Turks and Levantines) but the white whites of Northwestern Europe and Eastern Europe. Forgetting that the USA has a Nordic core and posthoc recharacterizing America according to its current state, they believe were heavily mixed with nonwhites and South Europeans, developing a burning hatred and aloof disrespect in the process. The sheer quasi-racial anti-American cruelty is unimaginable and makes me cry. But there will be a swift and deft punishment. Fast forward to 2026. The Anglo world is racially fucked (which I support!) Canada was 67% White in 2021, but its population has grown by more than 4 million, leaving it hovering somewhere around the 60% mark. Australia 72% in 2021, has grown by more than 2 million, leaving it likely in the 65-69% range. according to the 2023 NZ census, only 55.9% of NZ's population is of wholly European descent. meanwhile, while the UK and Ireland are still fairly white, the PM of Ireland and Mayor of Dublin have been nonwhite, and the FM of Scotland, FM of Wales, Mayor of London, and PM of UK have been nonwhite coterminiously. so they are fully "cucked" in that way. meanwhile, the Northwestern European and Eastern European parts of the EU remain far too white for the global elites (who i support) and Russia too white as well. both around 85-90%. The global elites are orchestrating a nuclear war in Europe right now that will "fix" the demographic problem. Conventional war is just not deadly enough. It will be short brutal and epic. 10,000,000+ Northwestern Europeans and Eastern Europeans will be killed. I am extremely ill right now so this is the best explanation I can give. But is it really a coincidence, the entire formerly Nordic English-speaking world racially "matching" at the same time? I think not. Enjoy the Russian nukes. I certainly will, vicariously (This will all happen before 2029 BTW, and will begin before April 2027)
Feels good. We will change the future of the world. White liberation soon.
Hi MW,
An excellent take. I do hope some important people at Restore Britain read it.
You forgot the Bank of England among the institutions that need to be taken control of. They demolished Liz Truss in no time. They could do so to Restore Britain. This might be the first fight should Restore win the elections.
Your analyses are good or excellent. But you have not tackled the pillars of Global Britain :
- the legal profession at 200,000 GBP/year for beginners and hundreds of thousands of professionals
- the financial profession at 100,000 GBP/year for beginners is a hydra composed of banks, asset mangers, hedge funds, private equity, securities exchanges, insurance, crypto companies employing 1+ million persons
- the real estate profession with agents, speculators, constructors, bribes to officials
- the high technology with IT and life sciences with another 100,000 well paid professionals
- the media under the enormous impact of filming and voice recording in international partnerships
- MI5, MI6, GCHQ, and most generals/admirals as allies of the CIA, NSA and the rest of the American spook state
All of them draw hugely from the international opening and free immigration. They currently vote Labour overwhelmingly though the heart of many leans Liberal or Green. They view themselves as the living forces of Britain that have to sacrifice a large part of their earnings to support a vast backward hinterland. They see themselves as the future of the country and the positive impact that their ideas have on the their London-centred environment. They will oppose very actively both Farage and Restore Britain because they fully understand that the retarded many in the hinterland want to destroy their good fortune.
British patriots, or Little England, allied with a faction of Global Britain to win Brexit. But right now British patriots and Global Britain are Schmittian ennemies. If I were to bet, I would bet against patriots and mourn the passing of Anglo Britain. Could you spare some thoughts on these really powerful groups and what Restore Britain could offer them so as to make at least one defect to their side ? Restore Britain cannot win through politicking an electioneering without the support of at least one major pillar. Such a support would also guarantee sufficient funds.
This is my plea to you.
Just returning the country to the state before mass immigration will not remove the natives who want international multiculturalism, of which there are millions, in addition to the major institutions you mentioned. And NGOs like Open Society.
Under restore britain's leadership, such people will form a resistance network, within and without, which will act to undermine, oppose, and subvert the government at every turn.
They will organise mass protests, false flags, worker strikes, sabotage, riots, false documents, underground migrant hotels, it will be a logistical nightmare.
This will force loyalists in the government to search for and arrest traitors, "protesters" and ring leaders, who their opponents will style as political prisoners.
RB will then be painted as fascists like the authoritarian state from V for Vendetta.
And in many ways they would be correct, to maintain any semblance of order they would end up a police state.
In addition, the detention camps for deporting migrants, and later holding subversives, will be called concentration camps, and as we have seen with ICE camps in america, people will die in them.
Providing the resistance with excellent propaganda material.
We would get a country even more polarised than america.
These obstacles are not insurmountable though, there is a surprisingly efficient way to prevent all of it.
Split Britain into Heritage Britain and Commonwealth Britain.
Heritage Britain is a homeland for those with indigenous british ancestry.
Commonwealth Britain will continue the multicultural diversity project.
The two zones will become self-fulfilling prophecies, the media will paint Heritage Britain as backwards racist enclaves, and the Commonwealth areas as progressive and futuristic.
Left wing people who want diversity will move to live in these areas, while indigenous british racists will flock to the racist enclaves.
There will be no need for mass detention facilities since the commonwealth area can be used as a place of exile.
This eliminates a need for concentration camps, clears out subversives naturally, reduces reliance on police state tactics, and provides evidence for the future.
In the future, anyone who begins to think that multiculturalism might be a good idea will have the ability to see it with their own eyes.
If they wish to live in it they can, or they will change their mind.
This addresses the final risk: resurgence.
Decades after success, international networks will continue trying to brainwash people, they will tell exiled future generations that we had a utopia and it was ruined by racists. That all the bad stuff is lies.
We could get a backlash that would reverse all the progress made.
If a commonwealth britain exists, and is clearly a terrible place, their argument makes no sense.
It acts as a living monument.
I agree with your perspective as is. But you do not act against Global Britain using the police+crown prosecution service. You hit them at the purse : you can threaten some on-the-surface-well-meaning regulations on each of the pillars that would effectively break their status and destroy a large chunk of their activity and income. Bad for the tax revenue but easy to put in place and quite effective. For all their moralising, these people are very sensitive to status and money. They will hate Restore Britain but remain mostly inactive. You would still need to cull the upper rungs of the judiciary: you can do it in the style of Blair by enacting some neutral-looking reorganisation of the courts.
An example. Say the BBC or ITV produces some propaganda documentary to rouse the upper class against the fascistic undertakings of Restore Britain. A month later the government cuts some tax exemptions and requires fair and transparent remuneration practices which markedly increase to cost of producing video content. Everyone complains but falls in line. One year later the government estimates that this tax-and-regulatory experiment is unsuccessful and brings back the status-quo-ante because they do not want to kill the industry. If the media decides to keep fighting, the government can strangle it for good.
So firstly, I agree that targeting funding sources are a good avenue to apply pressure.
However, I am not convinced that this is enough.
We know that international finance groups, MNCs and NGOs will continue to pour gasoline onto the fire if they can.
One could ban these groups, label them a threat to national security and freeze all transfers from their known accounts.
But in response, they will begin to channel the funds through other charities and ultimately through crime networks.
We also know that intelligence agencies are completely embedded in organised crime, money laundering and trafficking.
They will operate gladio style funding systems for their operatives if need be. Assuming they aren't already.
This may sound far fetched to some, but Islamic groups already operate far less sophisticated schemes to bypass sanctions.
And ultimately what we are dealing with is a sort of secular religion, many are genuinely ideologically committed and will act on its behalf without payment.
E.g. Witch hunts in europe resulted from widespread religious beliefs.
In the soviet union, citizens reported their neighbours to the secret police for little to no gain.
So, my overarching point is that safety is derived from a community of people with similar beliefs and goals who choose to be together and protect one another out of mutual loyalty and trust.
Just as we cannot force rival ethnic groups to play nice, likewise we cannot convince hostile religious groups to ignore their differences either.
The presence of adherents to an anti civilisation religion is a spanner in the works.
Exactly.
It is a policy that reflects what would happen anyway, we just formalise the result and speed up the transition to reduce the current suffering, make the boundaries of the new political regime clear, and develop the strength to resist further corruption.
The new heritage areas would act as a lightning rod drawing supporters from everywhere.
A tactical withdrawal and regroup on the scale of a nation.
That is a good point, but it is for Restore to sort out, not me.
Well said Woes.
Whilst I don't disagree with most of this comment it seems strange to advise avoiding Zionist finance for Restore (essential in my view) when Lowe has publicly stated the UK should support Israel.
That alone makes him a Zionist.
They all seem to be Zionists.
One has to consider if a) that was him sticking to the Reform line, b) him not being that knowledgeable on the subject, or c) in fact being a stooge for them. His mention of banning halal and kosher meat production in his announcement video is worth considering in relation to his statement on Israel.
Is John Smith the local pub crawler a true blood Zionist for thinking Israel the nation-state is the good guy vs Hamas terrorists or is he mislead and just going with his very surface level understanding of the world?
A) Lowe stated this when he had started Restore, which he still privately owns.
B) If he doesn't understand, he shouldn't be doing what he's doing.
C) Israel have stooges in all countries around the world.
Lowe is not a farmer - he breeds racehorses. It's like saying Statmers father was a toolkmaker when he owned a factory.
He made his money and continued to make his money in the city.
Far out theory:
Starmer is a nationalist and wants to cause civil war because
he actually wants the nationalists to rise up and take the country back.
He is martyring himself for the cause and playing 5d chess.
Everything he does is an act with each outcome calculated on the outcome it will produce.
Starmer married a jew.
He takes his children to synagogues with her and raises them in the Jewish faith.
But the clincher is Starmer himself proclaimiing to be a Zionist.
He is fucking this country up for his paymasters, not playing mythical 5D chess.
What's John Smith got to do with it?
Solid post 10/10. As I read I thought, is he going to cover this point? and yes you have. Ok, and is he going to cover that point? yes you have, etc, etc.
:)
Love your mind always. 🤍
And while I'm on a roll Restore needs two to-do lists. One for its manifesto and another in its back pocket to put through using private members' bills.
Something else that occurs to me is not to get sidelined in government by peripheral things like trannies. Matters like trannies enrage normies and are useful tactical points of debate when seeking power. But once in power, Restore needs to focus on actively empowering its core constituents and permanently smashing the other side's foot soldiers.
Retrospectively hanging Pakistani gang rapists and their enablers would be a far more effective immediate political priority than keeping trannies out of ladies changing rooms. It would also be far more culturally transformative in the long term.
The tranny issue could be left to grassroots reaction by removing the penalties, official or social, imposed on those overtly opposing them.
That's a good point. Anarcho-tyranny can be weaponised by the right. It really needn't just be a tool of the left.